IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [76attendees] Warnings re: Oriental Hotel

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer+ietf@nic.fr> Sun, 08 November 2009 22:24 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer+ietf@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: 76attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 76attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3437C28C0F4 for <76attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Nov 2009 14:24:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UcA6FK5d3sQ7 for <76attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Nov 2009 14:24:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.bortzmeyer.org (bortzmeyer-1-pt.tunnel.tserv10.par1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f12:420::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 733EE28C0F0 for <76attendees@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Nov 2009 14:24:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail.bortzmeyer.org (Postfix, from userid 10) id 75FF195541; Sun, 8 Nov 2009 23:24:25 +0100 (CET)
Received: by horcrux (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4E608157767; Sun, 8 Nov 2009 23:24:02 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 07:24:02 +0900
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer+ietf@nic.fr>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-ID: <20091108222402.GA21078@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0911061557460.99602@fledge.watson.org> <1257689426.3979.19.camel@khone.us.nortel.com> <Pine.GSO.4.63.0911080611390.15621@pita.cisco.com> <5F8DB291-9DFE-464D-96DB-9996D4E531B8@xs4all.nl> <8CC2426F-A8DD-4607-8AF5-DB83D7C4D9E7@fugue.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <8CC2426F-A8DD-4607-8AF5-DB83D7C4D9E7@fugue.com>
X-Transport: UUCP rules
X-Operating-System: Ubuntu 8.10 (intrepid)
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Cc: 76attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [76attendees] Warnings re: Oriental Hotel
X-BeenThere: 76attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <76attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/76attendees>, <mailto:76attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/76attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:76attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:76attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/76attendees>, <mailto:76attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2009 22:24:03 -0000

On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 06:01:45AM +0900,
 Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote 
 a message of 9 lines which said:

> > This is the first time I see the IETF-noc take over the networks
> > in a (the?) overflow hotels as well.
> 
> I have an IPv6 address in the Mitsui Garden.   It's a little spooky... :')

I thought it was common in Japan, often cited for its IPv6
progress. You mean that, outside of the IETF, there is no IPv6 in
hotel rooms in Japan (for instance for wedding parties)?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email