Re: [76attendees] RFID experiment suggestions

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Mon, 09 November 2009 14:49 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: 76attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 76attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04AED3A6942 for <76attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 06:49:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.584
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.584 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.015, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hO-B6QgPFPE0 for <76attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 06:49:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2001:14b8:400::130]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 184E53A692E for <76attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 06:49:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4EDDD4945; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 16:49:32 +0200 (EET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jAMgvNzpnf0u; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 16:49:32 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (unknown [IPv6:2001:14b8:400::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07135D4903; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 16:49:30 +0200 (EET)
Message-ID: <4AF82BF9.3020905@piuha.net>
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 23:49:29 +0900
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer+ietf@nic.fr>
References: <F9E73A6D-D635-4B0D-A9ED-E75C8D7132E5@nokia.com> <4AF76257.1090900@stpeter.im> <4AF7D8D1.7060707@piuha.net> <20091109141241.GA19402@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
In-Reply-To: <20091109141241.GA19402@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: 76attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [76attendees] RFID experiment suggestions
X-BeenThere: 76attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <76attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/76attendees>, <mailto:76attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/76attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:76attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:76attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/76attendees>, <mailto:76attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:49:08 -0000

Stephane,

> Many persons (for instance me)
> were worried about the lack of a privacy policy and the absence of
> information on the use of the data. "Opt-in" was partially a response
> to these worries.
>   

Yes -- I remember that discussion. I'm not arguing that we should remove 
opt-in. I'm arguing that when I show my card to the device it should say 
"error: you have not opted in!" instead of being completely silent. I 
think that is doable without revealing anything about the relationship 
of the RFID card and the person who it has been given to... but I could 
easily be missing something obvious.

Jari