IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [76attendees] A Net Neutrality comment

Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> Mon, 09 November 2009 01:16 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: 76attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 76attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAB6F3A6823 for <76attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Nov 2009 17:16:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.346
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.346 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.253, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AlH9etkQIEgT for <76attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Nov 2009 17:16:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sj-iport-4.cisco.com (sj-iport-4.cisco.com [171.68.10.86]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C0933A67D3 for <76attendees@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Nov 2009 17:16:07 -0800 (PST)
Authentication-Results: sj-iport-4.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AsoEAJj89kpAaHte/2dsb2JhbACBTcFPljOEPgSCYA
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,705,1249257600"; d="scan'208";a="48500102"
Received: from hkg-core-1.cisco.com ([64.104.123.94]) by sj-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 09 Nov 2009 01:16:31 +0000
Received: from host-24-88.meeting.ietf.org (tky-vpn-client-231-79.cisco.com [10.70.231.79]) by hkg-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nA91GU5e018191; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 01:16:31 GMT
Message-Id: <2C8434A8-4AA4-42AB-A2DB-19D472E32A06@cisco.com>
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
To: Richard Barnes <richard.barnes@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <88ac5c710911081705o911a7abx7b2ef43655bb848@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936)
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 10:16:30 +0900
References: <94C0E9F1-94A4-4C04-A236-37909CF10CBE@cisco.com> <F653BB99-4B19-4573-BBC2-629683A4DDB2@fugue.com> <0E896617-85A1-4DD0-8290-810C8E5F8463@cisco.com> <2E6BC2D3-70F6-4FB5-807A-FB10E3EBD8EC@fugue.com> <88ac5c710911081705o911a7abx7b2ef43655bb848@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936)
Cc: 76attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [76attendees] A Net Neutrality comment
X-BeenThere: 76attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <76attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/76attendees>, <mailto:76attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/76attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:76attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:76attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/76attendees>, <mailto:76attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 01:16:07 -0000

:-)

On Nov 9, 2009, at 10:05 AM, Richard Barnes wrote:

>>> One is one of the common viewpoints promoted in the Net Neutrality  
>>> debate. Two extremes of that debate are perhaps characterized as  
>>> "the ISP can whatever it pleases and can block anything it likes  
>>> at any time for any reason"
>
> If the other viewpoint is "militant libertarian", is this "militant
> fascist"?  (Corporatist?  ISPist?)
> _______________________________________________
> 76attendees mailing list
> 76attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/76attendees

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email