IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [76attendees] RFID

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Tue, 10 November 2009 01:32 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: 76attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 76attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56D193A6A42 for <76attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 17:32:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ygbjk8+7UiAo for <76attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 17:32:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::36]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C8833A6A18 for <76attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 17:32:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from host-40-47.meeting.ietf.org ([133.93.40.47]) by ran.psg.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1N7fbY-000OyY-Ku; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:33:08 +0000
Message-ID: <4AF8C2D2.8000107@psg.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:33:06 +0900
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "John G. Scudder" <jgs@juniper.net>
References: <7BAB4E87-5B63-4FC9-A6CF-576EB180A6C0@cisco.com> <4AF8BF65.9060406@gmail.com> <C94A1E54-133F-4F3C-940B-7F703F1960C8@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <C94A1E54-133F-4F3C-940B-7F703F1960C8@juniper.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "76attendees@ietf.org" <76attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [76attendees] RFID
X-BeenThere: 76attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <76attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/76attendees>, <mailto:76attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/76attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:76attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:76attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/76attendees>, <mailto:76attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:32:45 -0000

> It would be interesting (though scary) to audit our rules (both this and
> other RFCs) and compare to our practice.

as we do for udp checksums in ipv6?  netmasks for p2p links in ipv6?
...  (sorry, sitting in 6man)

when we say rough consensus and running code, we forgot to say that
there was any correspondence between the two.

randy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email