Re: [77attendees] Single Company Meetings (Re: Ad hoc meetings in real meeting rooms)

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Thu, 01 April 2010 06:01 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: 77attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 77attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D11A93A67F8 for <77attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 23:01:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.473
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.473 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.453, BAYES_05=-1.11, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e4fvCTRbV-I1 for <77attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 23:01:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2001:14b8:400::130]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 645123A67FF for <77attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 23:01:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5BB12CEC0; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 09:01:55 +0300 (EEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y+dhiu1D2RTV; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 09:01:55 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (unknown [IPv6:2001:14b8:400::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49AC52CD07; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 09:01:55 +0300 (EEST)
Message-ID: <4BB436D3.80201@piuha.net>
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 08:01:55 +0200
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100317)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Melinda Shore <shore@arsc.edu>
References: <114B7D3F-7906-41BE-ABB6-F3BFAB110671@softarmor.com> <4BB1F00B.7070504@gmail.com><4BB2051E.6070204@fandm.edu> <4BB20C6E.4080908@ericsson.com> <4623EEB5D02D4A67BA4CB5ED54F10790@china.huawei.com> <47C61786-20E0-4501-B31A-228FAB76598A@arsc.edu>
In-Reply-To: <47C61786-20E0-4501-B31A-228FAB76598A@arsc.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: 77attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [77attendees] Single Company Meetings (Re: Ad hoc meetings in real meeting rooms)
X-BeenThere: 77attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <77attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/77attendees>, <mailto:77attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/77attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:77attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:77attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/77attendees>, <mailto:77attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 06:01:28 -0000

Melinda,

> I'd be hard-pressed to come up with a reason for
> why the IETF should have any policy about those cases.

We discussed this in the IESG some time ago. There are a couple of 
reasons why IETF would sublet rooms. First, we sometimes control the 
entire meeting space, at least in the facility that holds the IETF 
meeting. Second, its a revenue opportunity (maybe not big, though). 
Finally, from a corporate perspective its easier for some of us to 
contact the IETF and ask for a room than it is to find out who is in 
charge in the hotel and book from them. And its definitely more 
convenient to get meeting space from the IETF hotel than from some other 
place.

(And picking up from the other thread... I do hope that note well does 
*not* apply ;-)

Jari