IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [77attendees] Ad hoc meetings (Was: Re: Bar BoF: ip traceback)

<joel.jaeggli@nokia.com> Tue, 30 March 2010 23:43 UTC

Return-Path: <joel.jaeggli@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: 77attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 77attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 893163A6BB2 for <77attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 16:43:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.843
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.843 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.626, BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7EszGplFS0+i for <77attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 16:43:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mgw-mx09.nokia.com (smtp.nokia.com [192.100.105.134]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAF083A6B62 for <77attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 16:43:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from esebh106.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh106.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.138.213]) by mgw-mx09.nokia.com (Switch-3.3.3/Switch-3.3.3) with ESMTP id o2UNhvpu021489; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 18:44:21 -0500
Received: from esebh102.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.138.183]) by esebh106.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 31 Mar 2010 02:44:07 +0300
Received: from smtp.mgd.nokia.com ([65.54.30.7]) by esebh102.NOE.Nokia.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 31 Mar 2010 02:44:07 +0300
Received: from NOK-EUMSG-04.mgdnok.nokia.com ([65.54.30.89]) by nok-am1mhub-03.mgdnok.nokia.com ([65.54.30.7]) with mapi; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 01:44:07 +0200
From: joel.jaeggli@nokia.com
To: tme@americafree.tv, brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 01:44:05 +0200
Thread-Topic: [77attendees] Ad hoc meetings (Was: Re: Bar BoF: ip traceback)
Thread-Index: AcrQX0rekqs4fkZFQRqUoeBf5wwTcgAAjooQ
Message-ID: <FE14C16A26F361409AB2A1D6DAA3590658662DA1D7@NOK-EUMSG-04.mgdnok.nokia.com>
References: <4BA8BCE3.5020309@is.naist.jp> <4BA95B6A.5040707@is.naist.jp> <4BAB0464.2010307@is.naist.jp> <4BAB7A4D.7070904@piuha.net> <8133D17D-D9B6-40A6-AE9B-80BF90A5223D@checkpoint.com> <050005AF2D0F493AB38639A33748E8D6@china.huawei.com> <8B0A9FCBB9832F43971E38010638454F03E24ED320@SISPE7MB1.commscope.com> <4BABD0B2.9050003@piuha.net> <4BABDB19.8060403@gmail.com> <027f01cacc69$4847ae10$d8d70a30$@org> <23E6E51A-5D3B-4F94-B32F-7F3545003E03@cisco.com> <53720E57-D96D-458A-8178-5CC3DB496FAD@nokia.com> <4BAC239C.4060004@gmail.com> <A6562703-7EF4-4B9E-9E78-AB30F804DD45@tzi.org> <4BB0B975.7040100@joelhalpern.com> <DADD7EAD88AB484D8CCC328D40214CCD0167972D37@EXPO10.exchange.mit.edu> <m2k4stbq9g.wl%randy@psg.com> <4BB24841.2080109@cisco.com> <4BB25142.20904@gmail.com> <4BB26010.9090405@gmail.com> <CDF5BB9C-F2D1-4146-B2E1-F7FD5CC39829@americafree.tv>
In-Reply-To: <CDF5BB9C-F2D1-4146-B2E1-F7FD5CC39829@americafree.tv>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Mar 2010 23:44:07.0555 (UTC) FILETIME=[E37E2D30:01CAD062]
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
Cc: hardjono@MIT.EDU, scott.brim@gmail.com, 77attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [77attendees] Ad hoc meetings (Was: Re: Bar BoF: ip traceback)
X-BeenThere: 77attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <77attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/77attendees>, <mailto:77attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/77attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:77attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:77attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/77attendees>, <mailto:77attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 23:43:57 -0000

> They are subject to the Note Well. That is certainly a rule.
>
> Regards
> Marshall

That is exactly the sort of scope creep that should be avoided by not formalizing an otherwise informal activity at the IETF.

An informal exchange between two or more parties who happen to be at an IETF meeting is not an IETF contribution unless covered by one of the six note well bullets, we shouldn't need a seventh.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email