IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [77attendees] Ad hoc meetings (Was: Re: Bar BoF: ip traceback)

Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com> Tue, 30 March 2010 23:46 UTC

Return-Path: <ole@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: 77attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 77attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E3AC3A6B59 for <77attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 16:46:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.371, BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id en7+FNwXMu3F for <77attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 16:46:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-4.cisco.com (sj-iport-4.cisco.com [171.68.10.86]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AC7D3A6826 for <77attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 16:46:11 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-Results: sj-iport-4.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgYGABcqskurR7Hu/2dsb2JhbACPQYtncacMgUgKAZdLgkgmghIEgyA
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.51,337,1267401600"; d="scan'208";a="107871414"
Received: from sj-core-5.cisco.com ([171.71.177.238]) by sj-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 30 Mar 2010 23:46:41 +0000
Received: from pita.cisco.com (pita.cisco.com [171.71.177.199]) by sj-core-5.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o2UNkfV1001779; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 23:46:41 GMT
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 16:45:04 -0700
From: Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com>
To: joel.jaeggli@nokia.com
In-Reply-To: <FE14C16A26F361409AB2A1D6DAA3590658662DA1D7@NOK-EUMSG-04.mgdnok.nokia.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.63.1003301644030.12816@pita.cisco.com>
References: <4BA8BCE3.5020309@is.naist.jp> <4BA95B6A.5040707@is.naist.jp> <4BAB0464.2010307@is.naist.jp> <4BAB7A4D.7070904@piuha.net> <8133D17D-D9B6-40A6-AE9B-80BF90A5223D@checkpoint.com> <050005AF2D0F493AB38639A33748E8D6@china.huawei.com> <8B0A9FCBB9832F43971E38010638454F03E24ED320@SISPE7MB1.commscope.com> <4BABD0B2.9050003@piuha.net> <4BABDB19.8060403@gmail.com> <027f01cacc69$4847ae10$d8d70a30$@org> <23E6E51A-5D3B-4F94-B32F-7F3545003E03@cisco.com> <53720E57-D96D-458A-8178-5CC3DB496FAD@nokia.com> <4BAC239C.4060004@gmail.com> <A6562703-7EF4-4B9E-9E78-AB30F804DD45@tzi.org> <4BB0B975.7040100@joelhalpern.com> <DADD7EAD88AB484D8CCC328D40214CCD0167972D37@EXPO10.exchange.mit.edu> <m2k4stbq9g.wl%randy@psg.com> <4BB24841.2080109@cisco.com> <4BB25142.20904@gmail.com> <4BB26010.9090405@gmail.com> <CDF5BB9C-F2D1-4146-B2E1-F7FD5CC39829@americafree.tv> <FE14C16A26F361409AB2A1D6DAA3590658662DA1D7@NOK-EUMSG-04.mgdnok.nokia.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Cc: hardjono@MIT.EDU, scott.brim@gmail.com, 77attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [77attendees] Ad hoc meetings (Was: Re: Bar BoF: ip traceback)
X-BeenThere: 77attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com>
List-Id: <77attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/77attendees>, <mailto:77attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/77attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:77attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:77attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/77attendees>, <mailto:77attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 23:46:12 -0000

What happens in the bar, stays in the bar, no?

"I think he lost count after the seventh or so drink, but I could be 
mistaken...."

;-)

Ole


Ole J. Jacobsen
Editor and Publisher,  The Internet Protocol Journal
Cisco Systems
Tel: +1 408-527-8972   Mobile: +1 415-370-4628
E-mail: ole@cisco.com  URL: http://www.cisco.com/ipj



On Wed, 31 Mar 2010, joel.jaeggli@nokia.com wrote:

> > They are subject to the Note Well. That is certainly a rule.
> >
> > Regards
> > Marshall
> 
> That is exactly the sort of scope creep that should be avoided by 
> not formalizing an otherwise informal activity at the IETF.
> 
> An informal exchange between two or more parties who happen to be at 
> an IETF meeting is not an IETF contribution unless covered by one of 
> the six note well bullets, we shouldn't need a seventh. 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email