IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [77attendees] Single Company Meetings (Re: Ad hoc meetings in real meeting rooms)

Melinda Shore <shore@arsc.edu> Thu, 01 April 2010 17:56 UTC

Return-Path: <shore@arsc.edu>
X-Original-To: 77attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 77attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFF323A6A10 for <77attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 10:56:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.284
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.284 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.186, BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jnbWm4QBLzti for <77attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 10:56:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from arsc.edu (mail1.arsc.edu [IPv6:2001:480:150:75::229]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DB763A6A1E for <77attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 10:56:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from viking-e0.arsc.edu (viking-e0.arsc.edu [IPv6:2001:480:150:860:223:32ff:feda:4a52]) by arsc.edu (20090828.ARSC) with ESMTP id o31HuiiN013631; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 09:57:07 -0800 (AKDT)
Message-Id: <D7D99AB7-24FB-48EE-AE64-5945020C87B7@arsc.edu>
From: Melinda Shore <shore@arsc.edu>
To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <4BB436D3.80201@piuha.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936)
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 09:56:44 -0800
References: <114B7D3F-7906-41BE-ABB6-F3BFAB110671@softarmor.com> <4BB1F00B.7070504@gmail.com><4BB2051E.6070204@fandm.edu> <4BB20C6E.4080908@ericsson.com> <4623EEB5D02D4A67BA4CB5ED54F10790@china.huawei.com> <47C61786-20E0-4501-B31A-228FAB76598A@arsc.edu> <4BB436D3.80201@piuha.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936)
X-CanIt-Geo: No geolocation information available for 2001:480:150:860:223:32ff:feda:4a52
X-CanItPRO-Stream: default
X-Canit-Stats-ID: Bayes signature not available
X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on IPv6:2001:480:150:75::167
Cc: 77attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [77attendees] Single Company Meetings (Re: Ad hoc meetings in real meeting rooms)
X-BeenThere: 77attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <77attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/77attendees>, <mailto:77attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/77attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:77attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:77attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/77attendees>, <mailto:77attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 17:56:43 -0000

On Mar 31, 2010, at 10:01 PM, Jari Arkko wrote:
> We discussed this in the IESG some time ago. There are a couple of  
> reasons why IETF would sublet rooms.

Ah, okay.  I thought we were talking about the case where
a company decided to have a meeting that coincided with IETF
meeting and rented rooms directly from the hotel or conference
center, which has been the case with IETF-coupled company
meetings I've attended in the past.  Sure, if the IETF is
subletting meetings space there clearly needs to be some policy
to deal with that.

Melinda

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email