Re: [78attendees] Lessons we can take from the Internet connectivity fiasco in Maastricht...

Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Thu, 29 July 2010 08:08 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: 78attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 78attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 564593A68E7 for <78attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 01:08:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oYaHm+M8hcrh for <78attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 01:08:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15E513A67D1 for <78attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 01:08:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.48.190] ([130.129.80.30]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o6T895Q8094534 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 29 Jul 2010 03:09:08 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <5BAF85033CB5F3439C4DE153165522B102093ECB8E@NOK-EUMSG-06.mgdnok.nokia.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 10:09:02 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A7CD9D44-D311-4DC0-893C-F794A953CB8C@nostrum.com>
References: <2172BD75-3FDD-4F4A-863F-59BA29B57048@nominum.com> <5BAF85033CB5F3439C4DE153165522B102093ECB8E@NOK-EUMSG-06.mgdnok.nokia.com>
To: "<hannu.hietalahti@nokia.com>" <hannu.hietalahti@nokia.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
Received-SPF: pass (nostrum.com: 130.129.80.30 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
Cc: 78attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [78attendees] Lessons we can take from the Internet connectivity fiasco in Maastricht...
X-BeenThere: 78attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 78 attendees list <78attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/78attendees>, <mailto:78attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/78attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:78attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:78attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/78attendees>, <mailto:78attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 08:08:47 -0000

On Jul 29, 2010, at 9:59 AM, <hannu.hietalahti@nokia.com> <hannu.hietalahti@nokia.com> wrote:

> Dear all,
> 
>> A while back we were talking about getting a 3G service kiosk 
>> set up at future IETF meetings...
> 
> This is of course up to the organisers and the operators to consider since there is demand for it.
> 
> But for my own part, rather than holding my breath to wait for someone to optimise the cost of my connectivity for me, I use the usual excellent service provided at the meeting venue or the free internet service good enough for VoIP provided by my hotel. Outside WLAN coverage I just use my HPLMN SIM like I always do and of course it works fine, like it always does. 
> 
> Oh yes, it does cost money. I was never able to figure out the logic of spending thousands on flight tickets and hotels and then using hours of precious time to find a local USIM to save 25 €. I saved more than my phone bill for this whole month by spending just a few minutes to find among the meeting hotels the one that offers free WLAN. I must admit that was not my main criteria, but the location at the city centre.
> 
> Maybe I am missing something?

The US carriers tend towards very high data roaming charges. You can easily rack up charges in the multiple hundreds of euros range.