IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [78attendees] We'll meet again...

Thomas Walsh <twalsh@juniper.net> Fri, 06 August 2010 14:45 UTC

Return-Path: <twalsh@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: 78attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 78attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEEC63A68F0 for <78attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Aug 2010 07:45:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.332
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.332 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.267, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KQ3DDGefn9oG for <78attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Aug 2010 07:45:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og114.obsmtp.com (exprod7og114.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.215]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A6CC3A6ACE for <78attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Aug 2010 07:45:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from source ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob114.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTFwgH+37+qGoJoUJCQKrlbZqOAgYoaTu@postini.com; Fri, 06 Aug 2010 07:45:54 PDT
Received: from p-emfe01-wf.jnpr.net (172.28.145.24) by P-EMHUB02-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.36) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.254.0; Fri, 6 Aug 2010 07:43:54 -0700
Received: from EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net ([fe80::1914:3299:33d9:e43b]) by p-emfe01-wf.jnpr.net ([fe80::d0d1:653d:5b91:a123%11]) with mapi; Fri, 6 Aug 2010 10:43:53 -0400
From: Thomas Walsh <twalsh@juniper.net>
To: "WORLEY, Dale R (Dale)" <dworley@avaya.com>, David Kessens <david.kessens@nsn.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2010 10:43:51 -0400
Thread-Topic: [78attendees] We'll meet again...
Thread-Index: Acs1H898zydj4i/OQGizJJR53t6wHwAUwjrYAAClxoA=
Message-ID: <A4C6A166C36F5F40A5767E6F66358FC090ED0CFC6E@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net>
References: <4C528047.20008@sidn.nl> <C2D311A6F086424F99E385949ECFEBCB03453A16@CORPUSMX80B.corp.emc.com> <4C5288FF.7000102@att.com> <4C53159C.2040806@ogud.com> <5CC58151-05C5-45CE-BCE6-13A6BF3731D3@nominum.com> <A4C6A166C36F5F40A5767E6F66358FC090ED0CF769@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net>, <20100806042805.GA7232@nsn.com> <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B21FE98EF7C@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com>
In-Reply-To: <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B21FE98EF7C@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "78attendees@ietf.org" <78attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [78attendees] We'll meet again...
X-BeenThere: 78attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 78 attendees list <78attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/78attendees>, <mailto:78attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/78attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:78attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:78attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/78attendees>, <mailto:78attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2010 14:45:24 -0000

Perhaps smaller isn't the right word.  Some people were complaining about having easier airline access than Maastricht or Hiroshima afforded.  Applying that as a screen would have meant missing such wonderful venues as these two.  I'd like to keep the focus on the nice job of the Maastricht host.  

-----Original Message-----
From: WORLEY, Dale R (Dale) [mailto:dworley@avaya.com] 
Sent: Friday, August 06, 2010 7:23 AM
To: David Kessens; Thomas Walsh
Cc: 78attendees@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [78attendees] We'll meet again...

________________________________________
From: 78attendees-bounces@ietf.org [78attendees-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of David Kessens [david.kessens@nsn.com]

I am wondering, what is your definition of a small city ? Hiroshima's
population would be the 4th largest city of the US if transplanted to the
US. Or to say it in another way, it is larger than San Jose and San
Francisco combined.
_______________________________________________

Though Hiroshima would rank only 20th considering metro area populations.  But the 20th ranked metro area in the US is Denver, and nobody would consider Denver to be "too small" to host an IETF.

Hiroshima's metro population is about 20 times that of Maastricht.

Dale

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email