Re: [78attendees] We'll meet again...

K KIM <gimgs0@gmail.com> Fri, 06 August 2010 23:10 UTC

Return-Path: <gimgs0@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 78attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 78attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6985B3A681A for <78attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Aug 2010 16:10:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nksdm9yK1Qyb for <78attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Aug 2010 16:10:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qy0-f179.google.com (mail-qy0-f179.google.com [209.85.216.179]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 439D23A67DB for <78attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Aug 2010 16:10:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qyk8 with SMTP id 8so6534411qyk.10 for <78attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 06 Aug 2010 16:11:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Z/N6vUJLGpZZ9EKpVzw0UdciCYmYHzKQJqEUmJUp3cs=; b=JkI1MllEIs6bNE8v+DhM17b0ijFxdb7MyLPUBqWe6m7navLZ1aXKOfAj7zBclH5AHA kjY7m9uY+44UTkBzTJPyT+Zki26iHnm+ZudarPTcBFI8hJ7PNAP64rezXt5/pkrfFDFA wRaeF/c51cqp30rIS3GoRhRzKQWv0Y3OdJaOE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=YFweyBLBBtu4E889qkPq0bIzI88mtla1JHL4iUm0AIdmVL7AU+TXwHDuPcne+5cv/k ZVoSV2mK+sbehYePyv9Gbv18Ze2mhFQ1mbh1R55BsCof/NK8V2Q2N+jWztIhyaLGAIRh AlS8IJfnSF4D1Gp897AeAROhyoecxolBknkZg=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.224.112.1 with SMTP id u1mr6501047qap.273.1281136263717; Fri, 06 Aug 2010 16:11:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.224.45.72 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Aug 2010 16:11:03 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4C5C69E7.6070205@isi.edu>
References: <4C528047.20008@sidn.nl> <C2D311A6F086424F99E385949ECFEBCB03453A16@CORPUSMX80B.corp.emc.com> <4C5288FF.7000102@att.com> <4C53159C.2040806@ogud.com> <5CC58151-05C5-45CE-BCE6-13A6BF3731D3@nominum.com> <A4C6A166C36F5F40A5767E6F66358FC090ED0CF769@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net> <20100806042805.GA7232@nsn.com> <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B21FE98EF7C@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com> <A4C6A166C36F5F40A5767E6F66358FC090ED0CFC6E@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net> <Pine.GSO.4.63.1008060746460.5592@pita.cisco.com> <4C5C69E7.6070205@isi.edu>
Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2010 08:11:03 +0900
Message-ID: <AANLkTimhyf7ZK9ydx2o3s0sWNswGeLgVMk=iSFHY9nB=@mail.gmail.com>
From: K KIM <gimgs0@gmail.com>
To: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485202395e86683048d2fc765
Cc: "78attendees@ietf.org" <78attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [78attendees] We'll meet again...
X-BeenThere: 78attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 78 attendees list <78attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/78attendees>, <mailto:78attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/78attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:78attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:78attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/78attendees>, <mailto:78attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2010 23:10:35 -0000

> This is less an issue with city size than with venue location within the
city.
> IMO, Hiroshima, Stockholm, Anaheim, and Vancouver had this,
> but Maastricht and Dublin's venues (NOT the cities) made
> the week more difficult than it needed to be

I absolutely agree with this opinion.

KIM, K.

On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 5:00 AM, Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> wrote:

> Hi, all,
>
> I too enjoyed visiting Maastricht, and like the idea of not always going to
> the same large places repeatedly, and don't mind a brief (2-hour or less)
> train ride after a flight.
>
> That said, I would appreciate future locations be less 'pinned', i.e.,
> where at least some alternatives (for lunch, [brewed] coffee, or just to
> take a break) were available within a reasonably brief walk.
>
> This is less an issue with city size than with venue location within the
> city. IMO, Hiroshima, Stockholm, Anaheim, and Vancouver had this, but
> Maastricht and Dublin's venues (NOT the cities) made the week more difficult
> than it needed to be.
>
> Joe
>
>
> On 8/6/2010 8:09 AM, Ole Jacobsen wrote:
>
>>
>> Cities like Maastricht and Hiroshima offer the "all in one place"
>> experience. Pretty much everything your would want to see/buy/eat
>> could be gotten to by foot, a short cab ride or even the tram.
>> This is also very much true for places like Oslo, Vancouver, and
>> yes Amsterdam (apart from the separation of venue and hotels for
>> an event as large as the IETF).
>>
>> This has a lot more to do with geography than it has to do with
>> population density.
>>
>> Ole
>>
>> Ole J. Jacobsen
>> Editor and Publisher,  The Internet Protocol Journal
>> Cisco Systems
>> Tel: +1 408-527-8972   Mobile: +1 415-370-4628
>> E-mail: ole@cisco.com  URL: http://www.cisco.com/ipj
>>
> _______________________________________________
> 78attendees mailing list
> 78attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/78attendees
>