Re: [78attendees] We'll meet again...

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Thu, 12 August 2010 21:24 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: 78attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 78attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C0C53A69AD for <78attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Aug 2010 14:24:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.335
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.335 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.070, BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dbZKE6AVV8jm for <78attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Aug 2010 14:24:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cpoproxy3-pub.bluehost.com (cpoproxy3-pub.bluehost.com [67.222.54.6]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 3DD7A3A68FC for <78attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Aug 2010 14:24:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 29715 invoked by uid 0); 12 Aug 2010 21:25:26 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO box313.bluehost.com) (69.89.31.113) by cpoproxy3.bluehost.com with SMTP; 12 Aug 2010 21:25:26 -0000
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=labn.net; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Identified-User; b=iH3eTW+KMLUlXayC2m2uPeilRIzbJHTmyvp611eXDfVUB29Fy98fGzONbehbwsleJXZZeCnzPyiBgtqDBA4oK5p6n044N83recO4qHPGQp/5tyOb71FBSdUr8ad3QVIH;
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113] helo=[127.0.0.1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1OjfHC-0001Wo-7y; Thu, 12 Aug 2010 15:25:26 -0600
Message-ID: <4C6466DF.6020705@labn.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 17:25:51 -0400
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100722 Eudora/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
References: <4C528047.20008@sidn.nl> <C2D311A6F086424F99E385949ECFEBCB03453A16@CORPUSMX80B.corp.emc.com> <4C5288FF.7000102@att.com> <4C53159C.2040806@ogud.com> <5CC58151-05C5-45CE-BCE6-13A6BF3731D3@nominum.com> <A4C6A166C36F5F40A5767E6F66358FC090ED0CF769@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net> <20100806042805.GA7232@nsn.com> <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B21FE98EF7C@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com> <A4C6A166C36F5F40A5767E6F66358FC090ED0CFC6E@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net> <Pine.GSO.4.63.1008060746460.5592@pita.cisco.com> <4C5C69E7.6070205@isi.edu> <001701cb37ce$2b810ee0$82832ca0$@com> <AANLkTi=dH+mO=AhiEd6k8sr13vOzeHo-gHS80BLyJ_eB@mail.gmail.com> <A444A0F8084434499206E78C106220CA01C46B4F67@MCHP058A.global-ad.net> <65214CCF-D559-4A71-8B26-01EEBFBD14B0@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <65214CCF-D559-4A71-8B26-01EEBFBD14B0@nominum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net}
Cc: "78attendees@ietf.org" <78attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [78attendees] We'll meet again...
X-BeenThere: 78attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 78 attendees list <78attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/78attendees>, <mailto:78attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/78attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:78attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:78attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/78attendees>, <mailto:78attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 21:24:50 -0000

+1

The prior LA IETF was a *much* better location.  (Although, I feel the 
same way about prior IETF in the Netherlands too.)

Lou

On 8/12/2010 10:15 AM, Ted Lemon wrote:
> Anaheim is a good example of the sort of place I'd really hope IETF would avoid in the future--it was like living on a desert island, because there weren't any real businesses within walking distance of the venue--just chains.