IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [78attendees] We'll meet again...

K KIM <gimgs0@gmail.com> Thu, 12 August 2010 15:03 UTC

Return-Path: <gimgs0@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 78attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 78attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEC5828C104 for <78attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Aug 2010 08:03:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MpVkTI2B7FWr for <78attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Aug 2010 08:03:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qw0-f44.google.com (mail-qw0-f44.google.com [209.85.216.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDD5E28C103 for <78attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Aug 2010 08:03:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qwc9 with SMTP id 9so1731660qwc.31 for <78attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Aug 2010 08:04:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=1n8r8fPrgKwfdptklElW9o/wWPSwkuM4S5X8Jogespg=; b=b/15WTI0+eE+JMMrWgQEOYkRX+OQjTuvU5OeJ3+SNZBjZllP/gy34jRRRPA/Ek+gVb mhQrTdpi16CBN8RLWkTxFWu9sui0t+ya0QzCmBx0uqS4oaGEn+ABid0T1licKNxTfrRZ 3F3DU6Ak4ALneW8BS4jFmaaEVmiXeTgqwajsU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=fTLiKaMeoGI0jCkCgdiaKtAGh2qVQJPrbsbcWsuVD30DJpR4CNKom9mWICuUfFkrin HlmmZw+4eX4/PX/ihm6nm7w4ERhu6KpJ2ygI7VN21hyKpudrSI7VsIbCPLZxhiFLMmr7 cvcpEVHZE2bjQxMemj66/4rjNVkvvAowEUYAo=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.224.26.87 with SMTP id d23mr67584qac.124.1281625449532; Thu, 12 Aug 2010 08:04:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.224.45.72 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Aug 2010 08:04:09 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <65214CCF-D559-4A71-8B26-01EEBFBD14B0@nominum.com>
References: <4C528047.20008@sidn.nl> <C2D311A6F086424F99E385949ECFEBCB03453A16@CORPUSMX80B.corp.emc.com> <4C5288FF.7000102@att.com> <4C53159C.2040806@ogud.com> <5CC58151-05C5-45CE-BCE6-13A6BF3731D3@nominum.com> <A4C6A166C36F5F40A5767E6F66358FC090ED0CF769@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net> <20100806042805.GA7232@nsn.com> <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B21FE98EF7C@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com> <A4C6A166C36F5F40A5767E6F66358FC090ED0CFC6E@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net> <Pine.GSO.4.63.1008060746460.5592@pita.cisco.com> <4C5C69E7.6070205@isi.edu> <001701cb37ce$2b810ee0$82832ca0$@com> <AANLkTi=dH+mO=AhiEd6k8sr13vOzeHo-gHS80BLyJ_eB@mail.gmail.com> <A444A0F8084434499206E78C106220CA01C46B4F67@MCHP058A.global-ad.net> <65214CCF-D559-4A71-8B26-01EEBFBD14B0@nominum.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 00:04:09 +0900
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=WeqsWVB6kC_3ZnaRY+LvEqTuEHgqpP+G_wqRQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: K KIM <gimgs0@gmail.com>
To: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00c09f9b0ce4a78dda048da1ad42"
Cc: "78attendees@ietf.org" <78attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [78attendees] We'll meet again...
X-BeenThere: 78attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 78 attendees list <78attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/78attendees>, <mailto:78attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/78attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:78attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:78attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/78attendees>, <mailto:78attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 15:03:34 -0000

On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 11:15 PM, Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> wrote:

>
>
> Anaheim is a good example of the sort of place I'd really hope IETF would
> avoid in the future--it was like living on a desert island, because there
> weren't any real businesses within


--> I absolutely agree.


>
>
> _______________________________________________
> 78attendees mailing list
> 78attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/78attendees
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email