Re: [78attendees] We'll meet again...

"Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)" <nurit.sprecher@nsn.com> Fri, 06 August 2010 11:03 UTC

Return-Path: <nurit.sprecher@nsn.com>
X-Original-To: 78attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 78attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A00A3A6909 for <78attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Aug 2010 04:03:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.846
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.846 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.752, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0qBdmaB+TwZD for <78attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Aug 2010 04:03:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (demumfd001.nsn-inter.net [93.183.12.32]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2975D3A68ED for <78attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Aug 2010 04:03:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.129.55]) by demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id o76B3b7H009405 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 6 Aug 2010 13:03:37 +0200
Received: from demuexc022.nsn-intra.net (demuexc022.nsn-intra.net [10.150.128.35]) by demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id o76B3aGq029506; Fri, 6 Aug 2010 13:03:37 +0200
Received: from DEMUEXC014.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.128.25]) by demuexc022.nsn-intra.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 6 Aug 2010 13:03:36 +0200
x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CB3557.0430E160"
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 13:03:33 +0200
Message-ID: <077E41CFFD002C4CAB7DFA4386A5326402741101@DEMUEXC014.nsn-intra.net>
In-Reply-To: <317616CE96204D49B5A1811098BA895002787844@XMB-AMS-110.cisco.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [78attendees] We'll meet again...
Thread-Index: AcswJHf5D11Do0krT6eBWGIZnN4E0wEsWFswABWxD70ACpjcQA==
References: <4C528047.20008@sidn.nl><C2D311A6F086424F99E385949ECFEBCB03453A16@CORPUSMX80B.corp.emc.com><4C5288FF.7000102@att.com><4C53159C.2040806@ogud.com><5CC58151-05C5-45CE-BCE6-13A6BF3731D3@nominum.com><A4C6A166C36F5F40A5767E6F66358FC090ED0CF769@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net> <317616CE96204D49B5A1811098BA895002787844@XMB-AMS-110.cisco.com>
From: "Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)" <nurit.sprecher@nsn.com>
To: "ext Monique Morrow (mmorrow)" <mmorrow@cisco.com>, "Thomas Walsh" <twalsh@juniper.net>, "Ted Lemon" <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>, "Olafur Gudmundsson" <ogud@ogud.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Aug 2010 11:03:36.0130 (UTC) FILETIME=[04550A20:01CB3557]
Cc: 78attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [78attendees] We'll meet again...
X-BeenThere: 78attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 78 attendees list <78attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/78attendees>, <mailto:78attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/78attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:78attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:78attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/78attendees>, <mailto:78attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2010 11:03:15 -0000

+1

 

From: 78attendees-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:78attendees-bounces@ietf.org]
On Behalf Of ext Monique Morrow (mmorrow)
Sent: Friday, August 06, 2010 9:00 AM
To: Thomas Walsh; Ted Lemon; Olafur Gudmundsson
Cc: 78attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [78attendees] We'll meet again...

 

+1!


-----Original Message-----
From: 78attendees-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of Thomas Walsh
Sent: Thu 8/5/2010 12:42 PM
To: Ted Lemon; Olafur Gudmundsson
Cc: 78attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [78attendees] We'll meet again...

I agree we should consider smaller cities as well. Maastricht (and
recently Hiroshima also) did so much to make IETF attendees feel very
welcome. Maastricht was a wonderful city and I too would like to thank
the hosts for a nice job last week.

-----Original Message-----
From: 78attendees-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:78attendees-bounces@ietf.org]
On Behalf Of Ted Lemon
Sent: Friday, July 30, 2010 1:19 PM
To: Olafur Gudmundsson
Cc: 78attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [78attendees] We'll meet again...

On Jul 30, 2010, at 7:11 PM, "Olafur Gudmundsson" <ogud@ogud.com> wrote:

> Overall I think my preference for IETF meetings is smaller cities as
we
> get treated better and it just feels good to visit towns that
appreciate
> that we are there.

Yup. Maastricht was lovely. My windows were surprisingly soundproof,
which was a good thing...   The bus service was great too--it's nice to
see a city where public transit really works.  Seeing the guy riding his
bike with the Weimaraner running beside out the bus window was a
highlight. 
_______________________________________________
78attendees mailing list
78attendees@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/78attendees
_______________________________________________
78attendees mailing list
78attendees@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/78attendees