Re: [78attendees] We'll meet again...

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Fri, 30 July 2010 20:18 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: 78attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 78attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 150A03A6358 for <78attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Jul 2010 13:18:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.254
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.254 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.345, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FUcaSDwBJXgS for <78attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Jul 2010 13:18:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og123.obsmtp.com (exprod7og123.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.24]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D7913A6B15 for <78attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Jul 2010 13:18:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from source ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob123.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTFMzv6TvOMdIVbNid2uFCVlventt1zjK@postini.com; Fri, 30 Jul 2010 13:19:14 PDT
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (exchange-10.nominum.com [64.89.228.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "exchange-10.win.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A914E1B837F; Fri, 30 Jul 2010 13:19:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exchange-10.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.57]) by exchange-10.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.57]) with mapi; Fri, 30 Jul 2010 13:19:10 -0700
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
To: Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 13:19:16 -0700
Thread-Topic: [78attendees] We'll meet again...
Thread-Index: AcswJHf5D11Do0krT6eBWGIZnN4E0w==
Message-ID: <5CC58151-05C5-45CE-BCE6-13A6BF3731D3@nominum.com>
References: <4C528047.20008@sidn.nl> <C2D311A6F086424F99E385949ECFEBCB03453A16@CORPUSMX80B.corp.emc.com> <4C5288FF.7000102@att.com> <4C53159C.2040806@ogud.com>
In-Reply-To: <4C53159C.2040806@ogud.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "78attendees@ietf.org" <78attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [78attendees] We'll meet again...
X-BeenThere: 78attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 78 attendees list <78attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/78attendees>, <mailto:78attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/78attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:78attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:78attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/78attendees>, <mailto:78attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 20:18:53 -0000

On Jul 30, 2010, at 7:11 PM, "Olafur Gudmundsson" <ogud@ogud.com> wrote:

> Overall I think my preference for IETF meetings is smaller cities as we 
> get treated better and it just feels good to visit towns that appreciate 
> that we are there.

Yup. Maastricht was lovely. My windows were surprisingly soundproof, which was a good thing...   The bus service was great too--it's nice to see a city where public transit really works.  Seeing the guy riding his bike with the Weimaraner running beside out the bus window was a highlight.