Re: [78attendees] We'll meet again...

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Sat, 07 August 2010 11:48 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: 78attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 78attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 276853A6853 for <78attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 Aug 2010 04:48:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.12
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.12 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.479, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MsflFCYGhQ-d for <78attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 Aug 2010 04:48:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og105.obsmtp.com (exprod7og105.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.163]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01C3B3A68EF for <78attendees@ietf.org>; Sat, 7 Aug 2010 04:48:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from source ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob105.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTF1IISynnotbgqtFSmBPzFyH7go0Iuay@postini.com; Sat, 07 Aug 2010 04:48:53 PDT
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (webmail.nominum.com [64.89.228.50]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "webmail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0A131B84E1; Sat, 7 Aug 2010 04:48:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vpna-148.vpn.nominum.com (64.89.227.148) by exchange-01.win.nominum.com (64.89.228.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.393.1; Sat, 7 Aug 2010 04:48:48 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <20100807113851.CDBDA549E@berserkly.xs4all.nl>
Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2010 07:48:44 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <5C94C45F-D3A3-4206-9732-D424FA0D0559@nominum.com>
References: <20100807113851.CDBDA549E@berserkly.xs4all.nl>
To: Geert Jan de Groot <GeertJan.deGroot@xs4all.nl>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
Cc: "78attendees@ietf.org" <78attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [78attendees] We'll meet again...
X-BeenThere: 78attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 78 attendees list <78attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/78attendees>, <mailto:78attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/78attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:78attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:78attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/78attendees>, <mailto:78attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2010 11:48:22 -0000

On Aug 7, 2010, at 7:38 AM, Geert Jan de Groot wrote:
> I agree the caterer failed big time on monday (partially because
> of the credit card thing really) but didn't see huge queues during
> the rest of the week.

I didn't see any *commerce* the rest of the week, which indicates to me that people either just skipped lunch because they needed to be in the venue and didn't want a repeat of Monday, or went to town, because they didn't need to be in the venue.   That was my strategy for the rest of the week.