Re: [78attendees] Lessons we can take from the Internet connectivity fiasco in Maastricht...

"Ali C. Begen (abegen)" <abegen@cisco.com> Wed, 28 July 2010 20:25 UTC

Return-Path: <abegen@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: 78attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 78attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E03E3A6849 for <78attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 13:25:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ILyOWhNDQncP for <78attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 13:25:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-5.cisco.com (sj-iport-5.cisco.com [171.68.10.87]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12A1A3A6879 for <78attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 13:25:11 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-Results: sj-iport-5.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAL4uUEyrRN+K/2dsb2JhbACgB3GnXYp8kA+DAQiCLQSEDoce
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.55,275,1278288000"; d="scan'208";a="232106311"
Received: from sj-core-4.cisco.com ([171.68.223.138]) by sj-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 28 Jul 2010 20:25:30 +0000
Received: from xbh-sjc-231.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-231.cisco.com [128.107.191.100]) by sj-core-4.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o6SKPUCZ012113; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 20:25:30 GMT
Received: from xmb-sjc-215.amer.cisco.com ([171.70.151.169]) by xbh-sjc-231.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 28 Jul 2010 13:25:29 -0700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 13:24:32 -0700
Message-ID: <04CAD96D4C5A3D48B1919248A8FE0D540CB6035D@xmb-sjc-215.amer.cisco.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Lessons we can take from the Internet connectivity fiasco inMaastricht...
Thread-Index: Acsuke3tb/Rb2xOPTwKqYRz+Xu9QigAAITag
From: "Ali C. Begen (abegen)" <abegen@cisco.com>
To: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>, 78attendees@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Jul 2010 20:25:29.0924 (UTC) FILETIME=[059A0040:01CB2E93]
Subject: Re: [78attendees] Lessons we can take from the Internet connectivity fiasco in Maastricht...
X-BeenThere: 78attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 78 attendees list <78attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/78attendees>, <mailto:78attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/78attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:78attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:78attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/78attendees>, <mailto:78attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 20:25:14 -0000

I believe the lesson is simple. "Do not organize a meeting where there are no guarantees to make the Internet work at least to have a decent VoIP call." Roaming is expensive, having to do a phone meeting over a foreign cell line costs a fortune.

-acbegen

> -----Original Message-----
> From: 78attendees-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:78attendees-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ted Lemon
> Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 10:18 PM
> To: 78attendees@ietf.org
> Subject: [78attendees] Lessons we can take from the Internet connectivity fiasco in Maastricht...
> 
> A while back we were talking about getting a 3G service kiosk set up at future IETF meetings, and I thought it seemed like a
> slightly unreasonable, yet desirable, request.   I'd like to up that to "pretty important."
> 
> Why?   I have wasted a surprising amount of time at this IETF trying to get working Internet in my hotel room.   Since I'm not
> at the NH, getting the folks in the NOC to do it wasn't an option, although I nevertheless applaud their valiant and apparently
> successful efforts.
> 
> Because this IETF was not near a city center with shops that sell 3G cards, it was at least an hour excursion to go to such a
> shop, sometimes two, depending on how the buses were running.   I wound up doing this four times during this visit.   It had
> to be during prime time - 8am to 6pm - because shops don't keep late hours here (nor do I blame them).   And at the end of
> it, because I do not live in the netherlands, and do not have the ability to receive SMS messages at a Netherlands number,
> the free offers didn't work, I spent hours on the phone with T-mobile, and after buying two SIM cards, one from Vodaphone
> and one from T-mobile, wound up with one disabled SIM card (Vodaphone) and one SIM card with a starting balance of 2.50
> Euro.   I can't add credit to the T-mobile card because my credit card isn't accepted because I can't put a U.S. address on my
> T-mobile account.   Total cost so far: 25 Euro.
> 
> I don't know how many other people went down this path.   I don't know how many were successful, and how many failed,
> like I did.   But it was a huge waste of time.   Having a cell phone provider that's on board to provide a bunch of SIMs to
> needy IETFers would have worked.   The do-it-yourself solution really didn't.
> 
> It's easy to say "well, Internet service in the hotel ought to work," but we have a lot of experience with that.   It never does,
> unless we run it.   IETFers kill hotel networks dead.   It's something we should just accept.
> 
> So while I realize that it's yet another annoying request from yet another whiny IETF attendee, I think it would actually save a
> lot of IETF meeting-person-hours if this could become a checklist item for future IETFS: not "are 3G cards available locally,"
> but "can we get a 3G provider to commit to providing 3G cards to IETFers that don't require local credentials to work, and
> that can be had at the venue?"   I think it would be fine to set up a prepay, pre order system, as long as the deal is understood
> up front.   And of course in countries like India where prepaid cards can't be sold to foreigners, or in countries where the 3G
> provider wants $1/kilobyte, it's not going to be practical.   But it would have worked a treat here.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 78attendees mailing list
> 78attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/78attendees