Re: [79attendees] beijing ietf network

Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> Fri, 12 November 2010 04:21 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: 79attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 79attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 725A53A68A5 for <79attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 20:21:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W5vC26NlWH0T for <79attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 20:21:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sj-iport-1.cisco.com (sj-iport-1.cisco.com [171.71.176.70]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC1143A684C for <79attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 20:21:55 -0800 (PST)
Authentication-Results: sj-iport-1.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAC9Q3EyrRN+K/2dsb2JhbACiTHGjc5sZhUoEhFiGAA
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,186,1288569600"; d="scan'208";a="380148955"
Received: from sj-core-4.cisco.com ([171.68.223.138]) by sj-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 12 Nov 2010 04:22:27 +0000
Received: from dhcp-77e6.meeting.ietf.org (tky-vpn-client-230-45.cisco.com [10.70.230.45]) by sj-core-4.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oAC4MP8Y023777; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 04:22:26 GMT
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4CDCBFD3.1040904@sri.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 12:22:23 +0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <910F71B9-BC8C-4CC6-A48A-3A557CD071B0@cisco.com>
References: <m2r5ernsix.wl%randy@psg.com> <4CDCBFD3.1040904@sri.com>
To: Ed Jankiewicz <edward.jankiewicz@sri.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
Cc: 79attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [79attendees] beijing ietf network
X-BeenThere: 79attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 79 attendees list <79attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/79attendees>, <mailto:79attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/79attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:79attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:79attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/79attendees>, <mailto:79attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 04:21:56 -0000

On Nov 12, 2010, at 12:17 PM, Ed Jankiewicz wrote:

> It's a tough crowd, and a challenging set of requirements.  This instance of The Network seemed to be one of the best ever.  No problems, no complaints.  Believe me, folks certainly notice when things are not working well, because we are utterly dependent on this network to get through the week, and making it to Friday without any significant issues or complaints is a top shelf achievement.
> 
> Almost as good as the international breakfast buffet at the Shangri-La.

+1