Re: [79attendees] Oops -- what were they _thinking_?

Adrian Farrel <Adrian.Farrel@huawei.com> Tue, 16 November 2010 11:06 UTC

Return-Path: <Adrian.Farrel@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: 79attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 79attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0A183A6DB7 for <79attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 03:06:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LKoLt5HpXDmq for <79attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 03:06:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from usaga03-in.huawei.com (usaga03-in.huawei.com [206.16.17.220]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD5723A6DA2 for <79attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 03:06:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (usaga03-in [172.18.4.17]) by usaga03-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LBZ000XM5KRGS@usaga03-in.huawei.com> for 79attendees@ietf.org; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 05:07:39 -0600 (CST)
Received: from 950129200 ([141.39.21.98]) by usaga03-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0LBZ0024I5KPOZ@usaga03-in.huawei.com> for 79attendees@ietf.org; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 05:07:39 -0600 (CST)
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 11:07:37 +0000
From: Adrian Farrel <Adrian.Farrel@huawei.com>
In-reply-to: <4CE174EF.3050207@computer.org>
To: charliep@computer.org, 'attendees' <79attendees@ietf.org>
Message-id: <01c601cb857e$7b8d6a70$72a83f50$@huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-language: en-gb
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Thread-index: AQFTsq03pVP3KSioPue2xbQIsMfCZgEwFzT3lFoWg3A=
References: <399924.41458.qm@web27903.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <4CE174EF.3050207@computer.org>
Cc: 'Bob Hinden' <bob.hinden@nokia.com>
Subject: Re: [79attendees] Oops -- what were they _thinking_?
X-BeenThere: 79attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Adrian.Farrel@huawei.com
List-Id: IETF 79 attendees list <79attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/79attendees>, <mailto:79attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/79attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:79attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:79attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/79attendees>, <mailto:79attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 11:06:58 -0000

Hi Charlie,

> According to my seatmate on my flight home, there
> were times when IESG or IAOC members would request
> that certain hallway discussions be terminated.

Could you be any more vague?

Thanks,
Adrian

> I knew that it was considered impolite to comment
> in public on the lack of Internet access for the
> un-privileged "other" members of the local population,
> but I was surprised that our IETF "officials" would
> also act as thought police.  Is it true?  Does anyone
> on this list have any more direct information?