Re: [79attendees] Oops -- what were they _thinking_?

Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Tue, 16 November 2010 16:25 UTC

Return-Path: <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 79attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 79attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B51F3A6CCE for <79attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 08:25:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PQrOuvwXJjSq for <79attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 08:25:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-gy0-f172.google.com (mail-gy0-f172.google.com [209.85.160.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A3623A6CA2 for <79attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 08:25:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by gyh20 with SMTP id 20so468733gyh.31 for <79attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 08:26:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:mime-version :content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding :message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=Xhkj1o+AmhtL8+q4z3KgsZyhHEpjdzN5o6pyG2ROe4U=; b=MYbQSm+ajMHLxySek0In8wp9QgvQgTtkp25zNR19wzC7rZbZeKwMf43e2OhxRCrP9u +aHTI6pAX4PT5xVpHauLKYudv0B1YFMTFF4+1dB/8K0gDwIf/4qI3v6COvwEqQXpdQ14 LDdR9pzpp2+gaJm2bWcI52rtiDFzUe09t79SY=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=InZZwZbj2jDU77uoNIyi0QAW+9Y3vWgQ1y4GGkAmKBu3h1ishwmLEOVMZLVpB1ny4X CguHUX/XJvXeYFzEjnuoTk3tG6+vhuDftFlWhZPZhUzi0SdXbGCIzsoDbpIltvHz4aOv RRK5Wets3cL/IH8G/c5g0QkNV/uvmAD0R8rIA=
Received: by 10.150.52.7 with SMTP id z7mr11894801ybz.352.1289924777771; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 08:26:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.0.37] (c-67-188-5-28.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.188.5.28]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m22sm889787yha.5.2010.11.16.08.26.15 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 16 Nov 2010 08:26:17 -0800 (PST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4CE174EF.3050207@computer.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 08:26:13 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <92DF9993-9C6A-4C70-9B71-A3B358378C07@gmail.com>
References: <399924.41458.qm@web27903.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <4CE174EF.3050207@computer.org>
To: charliep@computer.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
Cc: attendees <79attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [79attendees] Oops -- what were they _thinking_?
X-BeenThere: 79attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 79 attendees list <79attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/79attendees>, <mailto:79attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/79attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:79attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:79attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/79attendees>, <mailto:79attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 16:25:35 -0000

Charlie,

I don't know anything about what you are implying nor saw any discussion in the IAOC about it.  Perhaps you should get your "seatmate" to speak for him/herself.

Bob

p.s. I haven't worked for Nokia for 18+ months.


On Nov 15, 2010, at 9:59 AM, Charles E. Perkins wrote:

> 
> Hello folks,
> 
> According to my seatmate on my flight home, there
> were times when IESG or IAOC members would request
> that certain hallway discussions be terminated.
> I knew that it was considered impolite to comment
> in public on the lack of Internet access for the
> un-privileged "other" members of the local population,
> but I was surprised that our IETF "officials" would
> also act as thought police.  Is it true?  Does anyone
> on this list have any more direct information?
> 
> Regards,
> Charlie P.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 79attendees mailing list
> 79attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/79attendees