Re: [79attendees] beijing ietf network
Mark Prior <mprior@juniper.net> Fri, 12 November 2010 04:33 UTC
Return-Path: <mprior@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: 79attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 79attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1C873A684C for <79attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 20:33:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Igmav+B0QuwT for <79attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 20:33:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from exprod7og116.obsmtp.com (exprod7og116.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.219]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 042A53A6985 for <79attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 20:32:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from source ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob116.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTNzDhhaWXxMrcvr9Q9JjO9j2Ya6tH8Iz@postini.com; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 20:33:51 PST
Received: from EmailHK1.jnpr.net (172.27.128.41) by P-EMHUB01-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.2.254.0; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 20:31:05 -0800
Received: from EMAILHK2.jnpr.net ([172.27.128.49]) by EmailHK1.jnpr.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 12 Nov 2010 12:31:03 +0800
Received: from 172.27.133.201 ([172.27.133.201]) by EMAILHK2.jnpr.net ([172.27.128.49]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 04:31:02 +0000
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.27.0.100910
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 12:31:00 +0800
From: Mark Prior <mprior@juniper.net>
To: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>, Ed Jankiewicz <edward.jankiewicz@sri.com>
Message-ID: <C902E404.B1BE%mprior@juniper.net>
Thread-Topic: [79attendees] beijing ietf network
Thread-Index: AcuCITt1wlZomdebQseQDcAxnnQ3pAAASzNZ
In-Reply-To: <910F71B9-BC8C-4CC6-A48A-3A557CD071B0@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Nov 2010 04:31:03.0474 (UTC) FILETIME=[6A567120:01CB8222]
Cc: 79attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [79attendees] beijing ietf network
X-BeenThere: 79attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 79 attendees list <79attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/79attendees>, <mailto:79attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/79attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:79attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:79attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/79attendees>, <mailto:79attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 04:33:23 -0000
Is the breakfast buffet really that good? :-) Mark. On 12/11/10 12:22 PM, "Fred Baker" <fred@cisco.com> wrote: > > > On Nov 12, 2010, at 12:17 PM, Ed Jankiewicz wrote: > >> It's a tough crowd, and a challenging set of requirements. This instance of >> The Network seemed to be one of the best ever. No problems, no complaints. >> Believe me, folks certainly notice when things are not working well, because >> we are utterly dependent on this network to get through the week, and making >> it to Friday without any significant issues or complaints is a top shelf >> achievement. >> >> Almost as good as the international breakfast buffet at the Shangri-La. > > +1 > _______________________________________________ > 79attendees mailing list > 79attendees@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/79attendees -- Mark Prior Liaison, APAC R&E Community Juniper Networks
- Re: [79attendees] beijing ietf network Jakob Heitz
- [79attendees] beijing ietf network Randy Bush
- [79attendees] Re : beijing ietf network Dodi MBUTA
- Re: [79attendees] beijing ietf network Bob Hinden
- Re: [79attendees] beijing ietf network Ed Jankiewicz
- Re: [79attendees] beijing ietf network Fred Baker
- Re: [79attendees] beijing ietf network Lu, Hui-Lan (Huilan)
- Re: [79attendees] beijing ietf network Mark Prior
- Re: [79attendees] beijing ietf network hermin anggawijaya
- Re: [79attendees] beijing ietf network Randall Gellens
- Re: [79attendees] beijing ietf network Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [79attendees] beijing ietf network Randall Gellens
- Re: [79attendees] beijing ietf network Charles E. Perkins
- Re: [79attendees] beijing ietf network Karen Seo
- Re: [79attendees] beijing ietf network Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [79attendees] beijing ietf network Khoudia Gueye SY
- Re: [79attendees] beijing ietf network Dodi MBUTA
- Re: [79attendees] beijing ietf network Marco Davids
- Re: [79attendees] beijing ietf network Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [79attendees] beijing ietf network LEVRAU, LIEVEN (LIEVEN)
- Re: [79attendees] beijing ietf network Randall Gellens
- [79attendees] Oops -- what were they _thinking_? Charles E. Perkins
- Re: [79attendees] Oops -- what were they _thinkin… Henk Uijterwaal
- Re: [79attendees] Oops -- what were they _thinkin… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [79attendees] Oops -- what were they _thinkin… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [79attendees] Oops -- what were they _thinkin… Charles E. Perkins
- Re: [79attendees] Oops -- what were they _thinkin… Marshall Eubanks
- Re: [79attendees] Oops -- what were they _thinkin… Randy Bush
- Re: [79attendees] Oops -- what were they _thinkin… Bob Hinden
- Re: [79attendees] Oops -- what were they _thinkin… Charles E. Perkins
- Re: [79attendees] Oops -- what were they _thinkin… Charles E. Perkins
- Re: [79attendees] Oops -- what were they _thinkin… Dave Crocker