Re: [80attendees] CD is a chocolate?

Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com> Thu, 07 April 2011 07:43 UTC

Return-Path: <ole@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: 80attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 80attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBD4A3A69F5 for <80attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Apr 2011 00:43:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rFukMy0Kpj1P for <80attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Apr 2011 00:43:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-1.cisco.com (sj-iport-1.cisco.com [171.71.176.70]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 235F83A68C2 for <80attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Apr 2011 00:43:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=ole@cisco.com; l=1016; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1302162314; x=1303371914; h=date:from:reply-to:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id: references:mime-version; bh=jW0wlMyweglwOB1uUOH7uwDAG1sQEIxddNwoZx5OLoM=; b=Cb84ZUGD0eU6aVawTiQBz0QR/0LReyYSPNzORsJw5mlj7CtMqFRYyNyn vhTK08rrJP3PM6JLkNCyqMUwiX5R5Q/Msq30Qplh/H86hiPx2ajmIcTaN adrnRXeR3FwzbmqjTFW41wGN43Fq0U0a+rxBYifg8srg2cAfRN3EXJHsF Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgcFAOdqnU2rRDoH/2dsb2JhbACZYowed4h5nReCcw4BmWqFbQSFUItd
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.63,315,1299456000"; d="scan'208";a="425402095"
Received: from mtv-core-2.cisco.com ([171.68.58.7]) by sj-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 07 Apr 2011 07:45:14 +0000
Received: from [10.24.17.59] ([10.24.17.59]) by mtv-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p377jEHG006713; Thu, 7 Apr 2011 07:45:14 GMT
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2011 00:45:14 -0700
From: Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com>
To: Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@qualcomm.com>
In-Reply-To: <p0624060bc9c30881b3eb@loud.pensive.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.01.1104070042090.30503@173-11-110-133-sfba.hfc.comcastbusiness.net>
References: <BANLkTikeWLLZkpKvX2HgMWek8fe=Vrd=dw@mail.gmail.com> <p0624061ac9c04ac621f3@[10.10.38.213]> <alpine.OSX.2.01.1104042231520.34902@173-11-110-133-sfba.hfc.comcastbu siness.net> <Pine.WNT.4.64.1104051202554.5612@SMURPHY-LT.columbia.ads.sparta.com> <4D9B401E.2080901@lacnic.net> <p0624060bc9c30881b3eb@loud.pensive.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.01 (OSX 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Cc: 80attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [80attendees] CD is a chocolate?
X-BeenThere: 80attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com>
List-Id: IETF 80 attendees list <80attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/80attendees>, <mailto:80attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/80attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:80attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:80attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/80attendees>, <mailto:80attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2011 07:43:31 -0000

I can categorically state that this is not true.

The confiscated items were not held in my room, they were delivered 
to me by housekeeping after I complained bitterly. Luckily, I run a
"redundant system" which involves a second set of (mini) carry-on
toiletries, but this is already getting into TMI...

Ole

On Wed, 6 Apr 2011, Randall Gellens wrote:

> Perhaps the housekeepers didn't actually confiscate Ole's deodorant and
> toothpaste, but instead "tidied" the room so well that he couldn't locate
> them.  Surely all of us have experienced occasions when we couldn't find
> something, even though it turned out to be very close at hand.  Then, after he
> complained, the housekeeping manager launched an inquiry which eventually
> yielded the staff member who had cleaned his room on the day in question, and
> after a day or so of thinking (and searching Ole's room while he was out), she
> succeeded in retrieving them, but they had been safe in his room the whole
> time.
> 
> --