IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [81attendees] sucky Delta hotel network

Jonathan Lennox <jonathan@vidyo.com> Wed, 27 July 2011 15:02 UTC

Return-Path: <jonathan@vidyo.com>
X-Original-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06CF521F89A1 for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 08:02:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jtWOS0IMZqMF for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 08:02:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxout.myoutlookonline.com (mxout.myoutlookonline.com [64.95.72.241]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85F0621F899F for <81attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 08:02:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxout.myoutlookonline.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mxout.myoutlookonline.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3C29416F8C for <81attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 11:02:18 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: by SpamTitan at mail.lan
Received: from HUB024.mail.lan (unknown [10.110.2.1]) by mxout.myoutlookonline.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E154A416F8D for <81attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 11:01:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from BE235.mail.lan ([10.110.32.235]) by HUB024.mail.lan ([10.110.17.24]) with mapi; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 11:01:54 -0400
From: Jonathan Lennox <jonathan@vidyo.com>
To: "81attendees@ietf.org" <81attendees@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 11:01:50 -0400
Thread-Topic: [81attendees] sucky Delta hotel network
Thread-Index: AcxMbh2POQSNZa7zQgm1mIYD7U6lAA==
Message-ID: <D2EF498B-78BD-4CA7-B2E3-B891A2CC80A7@vidyo.com>
References: <4E2CC532.3090209@sunet.se> <4E2CCE72.3010500@sunet.se> <4E2E2236.2060808@sunet.se> <87EC2139-C7C2-4113-97E2-9EB9DA2406EA@juniper.net> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1107262259400.80739@joyce.lan> <89602A94-989B-4013-9947-0733AFDD60EA@network-heretics.com> <5104FDC225AB4EAFB44F3EBB5B1ED25F@china.huawei.com> <CACrD=+9zp5-471K78g2A1yp-Hb3S4Pq67SkAUWmAm2whqNdJeA@mail.gmail.com> <9C81D273-BB00-4AFE-8F62-92B94014927C@townsley.net> <44A4D0F6-4775-4C8B-848F-F65271F0C043@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|00dd9a1d56236d3fc19ed27627eee401n6QFGR03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|44A4D0F6-4775-4C8B-848F-F65271F0C043@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <4E30275A.8070705@kit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <4E30275A.8070705@kit.edu>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [81attendees] sucky Delta hotel network
X-BeenThere: 81attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 81 Attendee List <81attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/81attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:81attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 15:02:20 -0000

I had 100% packet loss in the Delta (in-room wired Ethernet) this morning (approximately 7:45 - 8:45).  Seventh floor.  I could ping the local router (10.255.1.1) but could not reach anything beyond it.

On Jul 27, 2011, at 10:57 AM, Roland Bless wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> On 27.07.2011 16:16, Tim Chown wrote:
>> On 27 Jul 2011, at 05:45, Mark Townsley wrote:
>>> Same here. Quite bad.
>> 
>> Interesting, I've not seen any significant issues, compared to
>> typical hotel networks.  It certainly seems better first thing in the
>> morning, when I guess less people are online.
> 
> Same for me. Although the network showed quite some latency, I was able
> to call via VoIP (SIP/RTP) in good quality. Maybe it's the physical
> connection (cable) that is broken? Do you see L2 errors?
> 
> Regards,
> Roland

--
Jonathan Lennox
jonathan@vidyo.com

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email