Re: [81attendees] sucky Delta hotel network

Mark Townsley <mark@townsley.net> Wed, 27 July 2011 04:45 UTC

Return-Path: <mark@townsley.net>
X-Original-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE6CC21F8658 for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 21:45:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TWZRYDPtAAqK for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 21:45:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vw0-f44.google.com (mail-vw0-f44.google.com [209.85.212.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BE3421F856A for <81attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 21:45:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vws12 with SMTP id 12so1055073vws.31 for <81attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 21:45:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.3.72 with SMTP id 8mr1802488vcm.21.1311741929248; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 21:45:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.255.254.113] (rtp-isp-nat1.cisco.com [64.102.254.33]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e7sm448519vck.17.2011.07.26.21.45.26 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 26 Jul 2011 21:45:28 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Mark Townsley <mark@townsley.net>
In-Reply-To: <CACrD=+9zp5-471K78g2A1yp-Hb3S4Pq67SkAUWmAm2whqNdJeA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 00:45:23 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <9C81D273-BB00-4AFE-8F62-92B94014927C@townsley.net>
References: <4E2CC532.3090209@sunet.se> <4E2CCE72.3010500@sunet.se> <4E2E2236.2060808@sunet.se> <87EC2139-C7C2-4113-97E2-9EB9DA2406EA@juniper.net> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1107262259400.80739@joyce.lan> <89602A94-989B-4013-9947-0733AFDD60EA@network-heretics.com> <5104FDC225AB4EAFB44F3EBB5B1ED25F@china.huawei.com> <CACrD=+9zp5-471K78g2A1yp-Hb3S4Pq67SkAUWmAm2whqNdJeA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Monty Montgomery <monty@xiph.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: 81attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [81attendees] sucky Delta hotel network
X-BeenThere: 81attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 81 Attendee List <81attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/81attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:81attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 04:45:31 -0000

On Jul 26, 2011, at 11:15 PM, Monty Montgomery wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Michael Ko <Michael@huaweisymantec.com> wrote:
>> Have you tried the wired connection using the Ethernet cable in the room?
>> It seems to work fine for me.
> 
> That's what we're trying to use here.  We can get to Google services,
> oddly enough, but almost nothing else.  We're seeing > 50% packet loss
> and latencies in the seconds range.

Same here. Quite bad. 

- Mark

> 
> Monty
> _______________________________________________
> 81attendees mailing list
> 81attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/81attendees