IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [81attendees] FW: New Requirement for US Employees travelingtoCanada

"Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)" <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com> Sun, 10 July 2011 08:51 UTC

Return-Path: <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com>
X-Original-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67D4421F89EF for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 01:51:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.841
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.841 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.758, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j34ysjPLVXWQ for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 01:51:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (demumfd001.nsn-inter.net [93.183.12.32]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A593921F89E1 for <81attendees@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 01:51:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.129.55]) by demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id p6A8oRJI030137 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sun, 10 Jul 2011 10:50:27 +0200
Received: from demuexc025.nsn-intra.net (demuexc025.nsn-intra.net [10.159.32.12]) by demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id p6A8oPE3015735; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 10:50:27 +0200
Received: from DEMUEXC006.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.128.18]) by demuexc025.nsn-intra.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 10 Jul 2011 10:50:25 +0200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 10:50:23 +0200
Message-ID: <80A0822C5E9A4440A5117C2F4CD36A6402577EB9@DEMUEXC006.nsn-intra.net>
In-Reply-To: <4F29BCF9-B528-4E79-972C-3B7EA350A842@icann.org>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [81attendees] FW: New Requirement for US Employees travelingtoCanada
Thread-Index: Acw+hfs5JSgQCt0vRBWUb5C8fBTRcwAWDONg
References: <80A0822C5E9A4440A5117C2F4CD36A6402577E79@DEMUEXC006.nsn-intra.net> <4F29BCF9-B528-4E79-972C-3B7EA350A842@icann.org>
From: "Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)" <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com>
To: "ext Joe Abley" <joe.abley@icann.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Jul 2011 08:50:25.0306 (UTC) FILETIME=[690D8FA0:01CC3EDE]
Cc: "Chu, Ursula" <Ursula.Chu@netapp.com>, dcrocker@bbiw.net, 81attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [81attendees] FW: New Requirement for US Employees travelingtoCanada
X-BeenThere: 81attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 81 Attendee List <81attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/81attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:81attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 08:51:13 -0000

The point is whether you aim to sell something, i.e. do business.

Our aim is Internet standardization.

Cheers, 
Mehmet 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Joe Abley [mailto:joe.abley@icann.org]
> Sent: Sunday, July 10, 2011 12:17 AM
> To: Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)
> Cc: ext Scott Brim; dcrocker@bbiw.net; Chu, Ursula;
81attendees@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [81attendees] FW: New Requirement for US Employees
> travelingtoCanada
> 
> 
> On 2011-07-09, at 18:04, Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich) wrote:
> 
> > E.g., if you tell the US immigration the reason for your travel is
> business,
> > they assume that you are going to sell something or will have
business
> meetings with negotiations.
> >
> > This is not the case for an IETF meeting.
> 
> Perhaps you are talking about some different IETF meeting from the one
I am
> familiar with.
> 
> 
> Joe

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email