IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [81attendees] Flying via the US

"JOHNSON, ALASTAIR (ALASTAIR)" <alastair.johnson@alcatel-lucent.com> Tue, 12 July 2011 06:00 UTC

Return-Path: <alastair.johnson@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F56821F9164 for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 23:00:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7nTqsfEzUzWz for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 23:00:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ihemail1.lucent.com (ihemail1.lucent.com [135.245.0.33]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E3BE21F9161 for <81attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 23:00:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from inbansmailrelay1.in.alcatel-lucent.com (h135-250-11-31.lucent.com [135.250.11.31]) by ihemail1.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id p6C60ZZB003140 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 12 Jul 2011 01:00:39 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from SGSINSXCHHUB02.sg.alcatel-lucent.com (sgsinsxchhub02.sg.alcatel-lucent.com [135.254.109.72]) by inbansmailrelay1.in.alcatel-lucent.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/GMO) with ESMTP id p6C60Xg1006063 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 12 Jul 2011 11:30:34 +0530
Received: from SGSINSXCHMBSA2.sg.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.254.109.78]) by SGSINSXCHHUB02.sg.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.254.109.72]) with mapi; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 14:00:34 +0800
From: "JOHNSON, ALASTAIR (ALASTAIR)" <alastair.johnson@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: Narelle <narellec@gmail.com>, "John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 14:00:30 +0800
Thread-Topic: [81attendees] Flying via the US
Thread-Index: AcxAUeVmOlpdQ63tQ3Co/Oyyxqk9IQABu74A
Message-ID: <00E8AAF99E25FF49A1F55E9A0CD19EBCB93DE69B7F@SGSINSXCHMBSA2.sg.alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <CAProHAQ3UTtQPsG+1cN_z4DheU-LddKLORa+pKRdi4=B3HB+Nw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1107060943210.53401@joyce.lan> <CAHBDyN7WgsQtKD4hcHCfTUiLkc5y1ituzu6SSxw+mpqFg0VeZg@mail.gmail.com> <7C4DFCE962635144B8FAE8CA11D0BF1E058939282A@MX14A.corp.emc.com> <CACRMD1Hina6NYw+4nJ7aW9=54hyXq9b-89O2TfOo8qqYfE0oTg@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1107112255490.2085@joyce.lan> <CACRMD1FU8k0aokWMCB5ZquDfwVH3fFVSa19Re=7sX2=Ha9mAmg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACRMD1FU8k0aokWMCB5ZquDfwVH3fFVSa19Re=7sX2=Ha9mAmg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.33
Cc: "81attendees@ietf.org" <81attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [81attendees] Flying via the US
X-BeenThere: 81attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 81 Attendee List <81attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/81attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:81attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 06:00:44 -0000

> Thank you - I have just noticed that my flight booked via Air Canada
> to Quebec is actually operated by United, and my flight back booked
> with United is operated by Air Canada... go figure.
> 
> Changing terminals at Heathrow has destroyed any confidence I might
> have had with interterminal connections.

Assuming your ticket was booked as a single itinerary (SYD-DFW-YQB and return, or whatever the actual airports are) and not as multiple tickets, you don't really have anything much to worry about.  The airlines will protect you if you miss a connection.

If they are separate tickets, then you have much more to worry about.

aj

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email