Re: [81attendees] sucky Delta hotel network

Marshall Eubanks <marshall.eubanks@gmail.com> Wed, 27 July 2011 17:57 UTC

Return-Path: <marshall.eubanks@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D15C421F8B42 for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 10:57:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.376
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.376 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.223, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S83B50qobpgx for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 10:57:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yx0-f172.google.com (mail-yx0-f172.google.com [209.85.213.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29B1F21F8B3A for <81attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 10:57:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by yxp4 with SMTP id 4so1212598yxp.31 for <81attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 10:57:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=hX3zgifwV1fitOTXd4iVBYh3smKg49vk1BoresrOLMg=; b=e7yS3lhLGZ7n0txl0YySiTrFleZAlDd+yrWhHZmCkM8J66FIXlp1DWR9OQEHSkBvc9 WVN6bEa8wJA/XF9tDBhtlZ9S083OscGbeLdWxzp+vyQrSkaBQMsGrPIBXhMAP5OT7S5H nqy5GJpH6QsJ9dM1C6iAKpURZjP2bOlYRTrHE=
Received: by 10.142.180.3 with SMTP id c3mr52360wff.211.1311789424292; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 10:57:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:df8::16:9227:e4ff:fef5:fe46? ([2001:df8:0:16:9227:e4ff:fef5:fe46]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e6sm102108pbm.23.2011.07.27.10.56.58 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 27 Jul 2011 10:57:00 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
From: Marshall Eubanks <marshall.eubanks@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <A9AF0D60-6DD5-46F3-A151-A72FFC4AB38D@kumari.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 13:56:56 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <4FE1AC89-DA55-4DE9-A2A1-BC31122AC9F7@gmail.com>
References: <4E2CC532.3090209@sunet.se> <4E2CCE72.3010500@sunet.se> <4E2E2236.2060808@sunet.se> <87EC2139-C7C2-4113-97E2-9EB9DA2406EA@juniper.net> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1107262259400.80739@joyce.lan> <89602A94-989B-4013-9947-0733AFDD60EA@network-heretics.com> <5104FDC225AB4EAFB44F3EBB5B1ED25F@china.huawei.com> <CACrD=+9zp5-471K78g2A1yp-Hb3S4Pq67SkAUWmAm2whqNdJeA@mail.gmail.com> <9C81D273-BB00-4AFE-8F62-92B94014927C@townsley.net> <44A4D0F6-4775-4C8B-848F-F65271F0C043@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|00dd9a1d56236d3fc19ed27627eee401n6QFGR03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|44A4D0F6-4775-4C8B-848F-F65271F0C043@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <A9AF0D60-6DD5-46F3-A151-A72FFC4AB38D@kumari.net>
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
Cc: 81attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [81attendees] sucky Delta hotel network
X-BeenThere: 81attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 81 Attendee List <81attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/81attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:81attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 17:57:12 -0000

On Jul 27, 2011, at 11:08 AM, Warren Kumari wrote:

> 
> On Jul 27, 2011, at 10:16 AM, Tim Chown wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On 27 Jul 2011, at 05:45, Mark Townsley wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> On Jul 26, 2011, at 11:15 PM, Monty Montgomery wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Michael Ko <Michael@huaweisymantec.com> wrote:
>>>>> Have you tried the wired connection using the Ethernet cable in the room?
>>>>> It seems to work fine for me.
>>>> 
>>>> That's what we're trying to use here.  We can get to Google services,
>>>> oddly enough, but almost nothing else.  We're seeing > 50% packet loss
>>>> and latencies in the seconds range.
>>> 
>>> Same here. Quite bad. 
>> 
>> Interesting, I've not seen any significant issues, compared to typical hotel networks.  It certainly seems better first thing in the morning, when I guess less people are online.

I have had decent experience on the 7th floor of the Delta. It is certainly usable for me there.

>> 
>> I managed to watch the German F1 race via BBC iPlayer just fine ... or maybe it was me eating all the bandwidth ;)
>> 
>> Is the Hilton's bandwidth being boosted by additional equipment for the week?
> 
> Yes, yes it is…
> 
> I believe that there will be more information presented at the plenary this evening, but you can safely assume that the primary hotel network is alway supplemented / replaced.

The Hilton is plugged into the IETF network. The Delta is not. 

Regards
Marshall


> 
> Hotel networks are designed assuming that only some (small) fraction of folk will be using is, and that they will be normal users  -- unfortunately IETFers are not normal...
> 
> W
>> 
>> Tim
>> _______________________________________________
>> 81attendees mailing list
>> 81attendees@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/81attendees
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 81attendees mailing list
> 81attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/81attendees