Re: [81attendees] Flying via the US

"Kevin P. Fleming" <kpfleming@digium.com> Tue, 12 July 2011 21:03 UTC

Return-Path: <kpfleming@digium.com>
X-Original-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04AF321F8C50 for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 14:03:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GwSbHVwyW3qv for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 14:03:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.digium.com (mail.digium.com [216.207.245.2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABAA121F8C4E for <81attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 14:03:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zimbra.digium.internal ([10.24.55.203] helo=zimbra.hsv.digium.com) by mail.digium.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <kpfleming@digium.com>) id 1Qgk6r-0001Yg-Fn for 81attendees@ietf.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 16:03:13 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.hsv.digium.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A129D8024 for <81attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 16:03:13 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from zimbra.hsv.digium.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.hsv.digium.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SG62LbpfGiD4 for <81attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 16:03:09 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from [10.24.250.46] (unknown [10.24.250.46]) by zimbra.hsv.digium.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 82CE7D82A5 for <81attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 16:03:09 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <4E1CB68D.3050808@digium.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 16:03:09 -0500
From: "Kevin P. Fleming" <kpfleming@digium.com>
Organization: Digium, Inc.
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110516 Thunderbird/3.1.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: 81attendees@ietf.org
References: <CAProHAQ3UTtQPsG+1cN_z4DheU-LddKLORa+pKRdi4=B3HB+Nw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1107060943210.53401@joyce.lan> <CAHBDyN7WgsQtKD4hcHCfTUiLkc5y1ituzu6SSxw+mpqFg0VeZg@mail.gmail.com> <7C4DFCE962635144B8FAE8CA11D0BF1E058939282A@MX14A.corp.emc.com> <3B41451B-D186-47C2-ABF0-04B94706D4D5@mac.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1107121108110.78845@joyce.lan> <CAJNg7VKg=x4mUHKxPzPfezR0XY8P4WCa-XL8ad2X5EGqw2oPbA@mail.gmail.com> <4E1C8F3D.509@ieee.org> <984159CC-4D08-442C-B2E1-F8D1BFFC9EC1@mac.com> <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A05851DB6190FD3@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se> <5B4968EE-7CF5-489D-B774-83B30DDF890A@stewe.org> <CAHBDyN7U2A+=1UXhBn3UG75tRHgeLXmRtdHDzoO9iLAHU61svw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHBDyN7U2A+=1UXhBn3UG75tRHgeLXmRtdHDzoO9iLAHU61svw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [81attendees] Flying via the US
X-BeenThere: 81attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 81 Attendee List <81attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/81attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:81attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 21:03:20 -0000

On 07/12/2011 03:56 PM, Mary Barnes wrote:
> Yes, while it seems many airports have nice transit lounges, they are
> not used due to all the increased security since 9/11.  For the folks
> that might be traveling through DFW, here's a thread of discussion from
> folks that have done so recently:
> http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/aviation_polls/read.main/218851/
>
> The international terminal at DFW is extremely nice and I would agree
> that if you have to transfer in the US it's a far better choice than the
> likes of JFK or Chicago.  However, I still recommend that folks avoid
> transferrring in the US if at all possible since you must go through
> security again and the rules used by the TSA agents at every airport are
> different. So, while you may have no issue with stuff in your carry on
> when you go through security at other locations, that is no guarantee
> that TSA won't give you grief and confiscate things that they shouldn't
> (sometimes without your knowing).  Lots of articles on this topic if you
> google.

In addition, if you purchase 'duty free' items on your flight leg 
inbound to the US, and those items are not permitted in carry-on baggage 
for flights that originate in the US, domestic or international, 
(bottles of liquor and wine frequently cause this problem), then you'll 
have to remove them from your carry-on bags and put them into your 
checked baggage for the flight leg from the US to Canada. This will also 
be true on your path back out.

-- 
Kevin P. Fleming
Digium, Inc. | Director of Software Technologies
Jabber: kfleming@digium.com | SIP: kpfleming@digium.com | Skype: kpfleming
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org