IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [81attendees] divine meeting locations

"Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com> Tue, 09 August 2011 18:40 UTC

Return-Path: <evyncke@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7829E21F8C6E for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 11:40:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -11.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.089, BAYES_00=-2.599, GB_I_LETTER=-2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dtwZkmS88e4C for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 11:40:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ams-iport-1.cisco.com (ams-iport-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.140]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4BBA21F8C6C for <81attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 11:40:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=evyncke@cisco.com; l=1396; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1312915239; x=1314124839; h=mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date: message-id:in-reply-to:from:to:cc; bh=4cABJGsFd1KZY49EtnAT0ubnn2ra3Mmusrx+JeWshyk=; b=iAbVZg11rPSD74VpF9WlnJcWEAzNcZOeD47ytgN9FsHDE+I76y3BMC2B OfLVKTIbnBLInaebQzeih8Gt7Z4CChYe1w9IHHe2rLkoeFhpmN6GKsssQ W6V+LiU/reGmQkuHUm1n4lJtDMBzVmTYt8U3jJkUfu+2LydsFv/MKRt6Q E=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AioBAPR9QU6Q/khN/2dsb2JhbABCDoQ5kxlEjjBqd4FAAQEBAQMBAQEPARANBDoLDAYBCBEEAQEBAgIGBhcBAgIDASUfCQgBAQQTCBqHT58ZAY0rkTeBLIQKMV8EmBeLITo
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,344,1309737600"; d="scan'208";a="108560001"
Received: from ams-core-4.cisco.com ([144.254.72.77]) by ams-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 09 Aug 2011 18:40:38 +0000
Received: from xbh-ams-201.cisco.com (xbh-ams-201.cisco.com [144.254.75.7]) by ams-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p79Iecc4013499; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 18:40:38 GMT
Received: from xmb-ams-110.cisco.com ([144.254.74.85]) by xbh-ams-201.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 9 Aug 2011 20:40:38 +0200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 20:40:38 +0200
Message-ID: <317616CE96204D49B5A1811098BA895002F01290@XMB-AMS-110.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E417DDC.10806@isi.edu>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [81attendees] divine meeting locations
Thread-Index: AcxWwzq+YhODFnH9RjqNgI2wZzmwaAAAJo2x
From: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>
To: touch@isi.edu
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Aug 2011 18:40:38.0400 (UTC) FILETIME=[D54B6000:01CC56C3]
Cc: 81attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [81attendees] divine meeting locations
X-BeenThere: 81attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 81 Attendee List <81attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/81attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:81attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 18:40:10 -0000

+1
Typed on a small keyboard sorry for lack of ponctuation and French accented letters.

----- Original Message -----
From: Joe Touch [mailto:touch@isi.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2011 08:35 PM
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Cc: Dae Young KIM <dykim@cnu.ac.kr>; 81attendees@ietf.org <81attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [81attendees] divine meeting locations



On 8/9/2011 11:00 AM, Ted Lemon wrote:
> On Aug 9, 2011, at 1:41 AM, Yoav Nir wrote:
>> "Who has read the draft, and is NOT a co-author or WG chair?"
>> No hands go up
>
> Yeah, this is definitely a problem. Not sure what to do about it, other
> than blackmail. There are so many drafts to read…

Well, if there's no interest in a draft in a WG, then it can (and 
should) be able to proceed as individual.

Perhaps that's the disincentive. Or just a workable alternative.

Joe
_______________________________________________
81attendees mailing list
81attendees@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/81attendees

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email