Re: [81attendees] sucky Delta hotel network

Monty Montgomery <monty@xiph.org> Wed, 27 July 2011 03:15 UTC

Return-Path: <xiphmont@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49BDE21F8A97 for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 20:15:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MZ6nqpyv8epR for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 20:15:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wy0-f172.google.com (mail-wy0-f172.google.com [74.125.82.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DD3521F8A95 for <81attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 20:15:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wyj26 with SMTP id 26so581269wyj.31 for <81attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 20:15:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Ciq/pJ07Dug6F+ZGE1nJU0s6GGWMmXX9hzRI5VPyG7s=; b=nayavIb4mfWuEzRIC8xUJootzWK4Ms513kEdRAwjxhCdctbgj+2hI/f1nImGgelTVj FzCFV/kD3y6RaSI4fPaW9RmEQ8CdRa9iLibAoiTf6RhycHVdBlLEpoo1QCidgRDEYwIe vCaOJP83f5/P3QeH/ZJruvwdBDZBGESAfdiuw=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.227.37.38 with SMTP id v38mr2762283wbd.46.1311736508645; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 20:15:08 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: xiphmont@gmail.com
Received: by 10.227.156.5 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 20:15:08 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5104FDC225AB4EAFB44F3EBB5B1ED25F@china.huawei.com>
References: <4E2CC532.3090209@sunet.se> <4E2CCE72.3010500@sunet.se> <4E2E2236.2060808@sunet.se> <87EC2139-C7C2-4113-97E2-9EB9DA2406EA@juniper.net> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1107262259400.80739@joyce.lan> <89602A94-989B-4013-9947-0733AFDD60EA@network-heretics.com> <5104FDC225AB4EAFB44F3EBB5B1ED25F@china.huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 23:15:08 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 4CB3AQFnUg3rNKtotL5Bqyu13vY
Message-ID: <CACrD=+9zp5-471K78g2A1yp-Hb3S4Pq67SkAUWmAm2whqNdJeA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Monty Montgomery <monty@xiph.org>
To: Michael Ko <Michael@huaweisymantec.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: 81attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [81attendees] sucky Delta hotel network
X-BeenThere: 81attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 81 Attendee List <81attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/81attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:81attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 03:15:10 -0000

On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Michael Ko <Michael@huaweisymantec.com> wrote:
> Have you tried the wired connection using the Ethernet cable in the room?
> It seems to work fine for me.

That's what we're trying to use here.  We can get to Google services,
oddly enough, but almost nothing else.  We're seeing > 50% packet loss
and latencies in the seconds range.

Monty