[81attendees] FW: New Requirement for US Employees traveling toCanada
"Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)" <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com> Sat, 09 July 2011 22:04 UTC
Return-Path: <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com>
X-Original-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id BDAF421F8A4F for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Sat, 9 Jul 2011 15:04:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.489
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.489 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=2.109,
BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4,
USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7jO8t3QVAhae for
<81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Jul 2011 15:04:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demumfd002.nsn-inter.net (demumfd002.nsn-inter.net
[93.183.12.31]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 643E621F8A43 for
<81attendees@ietf.org>; Sat, 9 Jul 2011 15:04:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demuprx017.emea.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.129.56]) by
demumfd002.nsn-inter.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id
p69M46sd025660 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256
verify=OK); Sun, 10 Jul 2011 00:04:06 +0200
Received: from DEMUEXC048.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.32.94]) by
demuprx017.emea.nsn-intra.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id
p69M460G012326; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 00:04:06 +0200
Received: from DEMUEXC006.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.128.18]) by
DEMUEXC048.nsn-intra.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);
Sun, 10 Jul 2011 00:04:06 +0200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CC3E84.1EA5097F"
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 00:04:05 +0200
Message-ID: <80A0822C5E9A4440A5117C2F4CD36A6402577E79@DEMUEXC006.nsn-intra.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [81attendees] New Requirement for US Employees traveling toCanada
Thread-Index: Acw+W37B3tjAHVSyQt6MvsIrilVphwABftvwAAiaMCA=
From: "Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)" <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com>
To: "ext Scott Brim" <scott.brim@gmail.com>, <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Jul 2011 22:04:06.0723 (UTC)
FILETIME=[1F376130:01CC3E84]
Cc: "Chu, Ursula" <Ursula.Chu@netapp.com>, 81attendees@ietf.org
Subject: [81attendees] FW: New Requirement for US Employees traveling toCanada
X-BeenThere: 81attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 81 Attendee List <81attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/81attendees>,
<mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/81attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:81attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/81attendees>,
<mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2011 22:04:19 -0000
Exactly. There is a difference for the travel reason between "business" and "attendance in an international conference". E.g., if you tell the US immigration the reason for your travel is business, they assume that you are going to sell something or will have business meetings with negotiations. This is not the case for an IETF meeting. Cheers, Mehmet From: 81attendees-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:81attendees-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of ext Scott Brim Sent: Saturday, July 09, 2011 7:13 PM To: dcrocker@bbiw.net Cc: Chu, Ursula; 81attendees@ietf.org Subject: Re: [81attendees] New Requirement for US Employees traveling toCanada I say "conference of people from all over the world... You should see a lot more like me coming through. We're all here to try to make the Internet better".
- [81attendees] FW: New Requirement for US Employee… Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)
- Re: [81attendees] FW: New Requirement for US Empl… Joe Abley
- Re: [81attendees] FW: New Requirement for US Empl… Randy Bush
- Re: [81attendees] FW: New Requirement for US Empl… John R. Levine
- Re: [81attendees] FW: New Requirement for US Empl… Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)
- Re: [81attendees] FW: New Requirement for US Empl… Ross Callon
- Re: [81attendees] FW: New Requirement for US Empl… Michael Richardson
- Re: [81attendees] FW: New Requirement for US Empl… Alan DeKok
- Re: [81attendees] FW: New Requirement for US Empl… Klaas Wierenga
- Re: [81attendees] FW: New Requirement for US Empl… Alan T DeKok