Re: [81attendees] Flying via the US
Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Tue, 12 July 2011 20:34 UTC
Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 8D98A21F8AE9 for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Tue, 12 Jul 2011 13:34:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.505
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.505 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.094,
BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aMQOAecAVkUa for
<81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 13:34:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw10.se.ericsson.net (mailgw10.se.ericsson.net
[193.180.251.61]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DC4521F8AE1 for
<81attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 13:34:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb3d-b7c17ae00000262e-33-4e1cafe571e1
Received: from esessmw0247.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124])
by mailgw10.se.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id
EA.B9.09774.5EFAC1E4; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 22:34:46 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se ([169.254.1.123]) by
esessmw0247.eemea.ericsson.se ([10.2.3.116]) with mapi;
Tue, 12 Jul 2011 22:34:45 +0200
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: John Bradley <jbradley@mac.com>, "thompson@ieee.org" <thompson@ieee.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 22:34:44 +0200
Thread-Topic: [81attendees] Flying via the US
Thread-Index: AcxAwUxNgauYlHYnSUG592iLaerVawAEP7Wl
Message-ID: <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A05851DB6190FD3@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se>
References: <CAProHAQ3UTtQPsG+1cN_z4DheU-LddKLORa+pKRdi4=B3HB+Nw@mail.gmail.com>
<alpine.BSF.2.00.1107060943210.53401@joyce.lan>
<CAHBDyN7WgsQtKD4hcHCfTUiLkc5y1ituzu6SSxw+mpqFg0VeZg@mail.gmail.com>
<7C4DFCE962635144B8FAE8CA11D0BF1E058939282A@MX14A.corp.emc.com>
<3B41451B-D186-47C2-ABF0-04B94706D4D5@mac.com>
<alpine.BSF.2.00.1107121108110.78845@joyce.lan>
<CAJNg7VKg=x4mUHKxPzPfezR0XY8P4WCa-XL8ad2X5EGqw2oPbA@mail.gmail.com>
<4E1C8F3D.509@ieee.org>, <984159CC-4D08-442C-B2E1-F8D1BFFC9EC1@mac.com>
In-Reply-To: <984159CC-4D08-442C-B2E1-F8D1BFFC9EC1@mac.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Cc: "81attendees@ietf.org" <81attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [81attendees] Flying via the US
X-BeenThere: 81attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 81 Attendee List <81attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/81attendees>,
<mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/81attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:81attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/81attendees>,
<mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 20:34:51 -0000
Hi, Eventhough one will have to pass US immigration even in the transit case, I believe there are now places (some terminal(s) at SFO?) where you don't have to enter the public area when moving to your next flight. Regards, Christer ________________________________________ From: 81attendees-bounces@ietf.org [81attendees-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of John Bradley [jbradley@mac.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 9:26 PM To: thompson@ieee.org Cc: 81attendees@ietf.org Subject: Re: [81attendees] Flying via the US The difference between a transit visa and a visitors visa is that for the transit you have to show that you have a outbound flight. You are also limited to a very short stay. Both release you into the unsecured public area. They just will bar you if you overstay a transit visa. A friend of mine who works for the NZ Gov and normally travels on his Gov work visa, got into trouble in the US when he was traveling to Europe and changed planes in the US. Apparently because he wasn't traveling for government work, he was supposed to apply for a transit or tourist visa. It never occurred to him that his B1 visa wouldn't let him transit. It got sorted out and he made his flight but they gave him a very hard time, taking him to a room and questioning him. If you are not absolutely certain you don't need a visa (Canadian) then you should double check if your flight touches down in the US at all. John Bradley On 2011-07-12, at 2:15 PM, Geoff Thompson wrote: > On 127//11 10:16 AM, Marshall Eubanks wrote: >> >> The US does offer transit visas - http://travel.state.gov/visa/temp/types/types_4383.html >> >> There seems to be the usual bureaucratic hassle involved. >> > > I expect that is because once you are at the point where you recheck your baggage you can just walk out into the unsecured areas of the terminal (and the US). > > I haven't seen any US airport setups that operate in any other manner (but then I am not a "transit passenger" when I am in the US). > > Geoff > _______________________________________________ > 81attendees mailing list > 81attendees@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/81attendees _______________________________________________ 81attendees mailing list 81attendees@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/81attendees
- [81attendees] Ways to Quebec City from Toronto by… Zhen Cao
- Re: [81attendees] Ways to Quebec City from Toront… edward.j.beroset
- Re: [81attendees] Ways to Quebec City from Toront… Marc Blanchet
- Re: [81attendees] Ways to Quebec City from Toront… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [81attendees] Ways to Quebec City from Toront… Duncan, Ian
- Re: [81attendees] Ways to Quebec City from Toront… Christian Hoene
- Re: [81attendees] Ways to Quebec City from Toront… John R. Levine
- Re: [81attendees] Ways to Quebec City from Toront… David Allan I
- Re: [81attendees] Ways to Quebec City from Toront… Kevin P. Fleming
- Re: [81attendees] Ways to Quebec City from Toront… Mary Barnes
- Re: [81attendees] Ways to Quebec City from Toront… John R. Levine
- [81attendees] Flying via the US david.black
- Re: [81attendees] Flying via the US John R. Levine
- Re: [81attendees] Ways to Quebec City from Toront… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [81attendees] Ways to Quebec City from Toront… Paul Wouters
- Re: [81attendees] Ways to Quebec City from Toront… Paul Wouters
- Re: [81attendees] Ways to Quebec City from Toront… Marc Blanchet
- [81attendees] Airport Shuttle from Quebec airport… Dhiva
- Re: [81attendees] Ways to Quebec City from Toront… Paul Wouters
- Re: [81attendees] Airport Shuttle from Quebec air… Paul Wouters
- Re: [81attendees] Airport Shuttle from Quebec air… Marc Blanchet
- Re: [81attendees] Flying via the US Simon Perreault
- Re: [81attendees] Airport Shuttle from Quebec air… John R. Levine
- Re: [81attendees] Airport Shuttle from Quebec air… Simon Perreault
- Re: [81attendees] Airport Shuttle from Quebec air… Gregory Mirsky
- Re: [81attendees] Airport Shuttle from Quebec air… Jeff Haas
- Re: [81attendees] Airport Shuttle from Quebec air… John R. Levine
- Re: [81attendees] Airport Shuttle from Quebec air… Gregory Mirsky
- Re: [81attendees] Airport Shuttle from Quebec air… Larissa Shapiro
- Re: [81attendees] Airport Shuttle from Quebec air… Marc Blanchet
- Re: [81attendees] Airport Shuttle from Quebec air… Marc Blanchet
- [81attendees] New Requirement for US Employees tr… Chu, Ursula
- Re: [81attendees] New Requirement for US Employee… John R. Levine
- Re: [81attendees] New Requirement for US Employee… Mary Barnes
- Re: [81attendees] New Requirement for US Employee… John R. Levine
- Re: [81attendees] New Requirement for US Employee… Dhiva
- Re: [81attendees] New Requirement for US Employee… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [81attendees] New Requirement for US Employee… Scott Brim
- Re: [81attendees] New Requirement for US Employee… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [81attendees] New Requirement for US Employee… Dave Crocker
- Re: [81attendees] New Requirement for US Employee… Scott Brim
- Re: [81attendees] New Requirement for US Employee… John C Klensin
- Re: [81attendees] New Requirement for US Employee… Geoff Thompson
- Re: [81attendees] New Requirement for US Employee… Richard Barnes
- Re: [81attendees] New Requirement for US Employee… Jon Hudson
- Re: [81attendees] New Requirement for US Employee… Sarah Banks
- Re: [81attendees] New Requirement for US Employee… Christian Martin
- Re: [81attendees] New Requirement for US Employee… Randy Bush
- Re: [81attendees] New Requirement for US Employee… Samuel Weiler
- Re: [81attendees] New Requirement for US Employee… Narelle
- Re: [81attendees] New Requirement for US Employee… Randy Bush
- Re: [81attendees] New Requirement for US Employee… Bill Atwood
- Re: [81attendees] Flying via the US Narelle
- Re: [81attendees] Flying via the US Anthony Nadalin
- Re: [81attendees] Flying via the US Basavaraj.Patil
- Re: [81attendees] Flying via the US John R. Levine
- Re: [81attendees] Flying via the US Ben Campbell
- Re: [81attendees] Flying via the US Victor Kuarsingh
- Re: [81attendees] Flying via the US John Bradley
- Re: [81attendees] Flying via the US Narelle
- Re: [81attendees] Flying via the US Randy Bush
- Re: [81attendees] Flying via the US JOHNSON, ALASTAIR (ALASTAIR)
- Re: [81attendees] Flying via the US Olaf Kolkman
- Re: [81attendees] Flying via the US Martin Hoffmann
- Re: [81attendees] Flying via the US John R. Levine
- Re: [81attendees] Flying via the US John Bradley
- Re: [81attendees] Flying via the US Andrew Allen
- Re: [81attendees] Flying via the US John R. Levine
- Re: [81attendees] Flying via the US Marshall Eubanks
- Re: [81attendees] Flying via the US Geoff Thompson
- Re: [81attendees] Flying via the US John R. Levine
- Re: [81attendees] Flying via the US John Bradley
- Re: [81attendees] Flying via the US Christer Holmberg
- Re: [81attendees] Flying via the US Stephan Wenger
- Re: [81attendees] Flying via the US Mary Barnes
- Re: [81attendees] Flying via the US Kevin P. Fleming
- Re: [81attendees] Flying via the US Geoff Thompson
- Re: [81attendees] Train from Toronto to Quebec//W… xiaohong.deng
- Re: [81attendees] Train from Toronto to Quebec//W… John R. Levine
- Re: [81attendees] Train from Toronto to Quebec//W… John R. Levine
- Re: [81attendees] Train from Toronto to Quebec//W… Marc Blanchet
- [81attendees] Toronto cuisine, was Re: Train from… Paul Wouters
- Re: [81attendees] Flying via the US Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [81attendees] Toronto cuisine, was Re: Train … Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [81attendees] Train from Toronto to Quebec//W… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [81attendees] Flying via the US Zhao yi
- Re: [81attendees] Train from Toronto to Quebec//W… John R. Levine
- Re: [81attendees] Flying via the US Narelle
- Re: [81attendees] Train from Toronto to Quebec//W… Mark Jones
- Re: [81attendees] Train from Toronto to Quebec//W… Curtis Villamizar
- Re: [81attendees] Airport Shuttle from Quebec air… Zhen Cao
- Re: [81attendees] Airport Shuttle from Quebec air… Simon Perreault
- Re: [81attendees] Airport Shuttle from Quebec air… Simon Perreault
- [81attendees] Anyone arriving on Saturday Night Dhiva
- Re: [81attendees] New Requirement for US Employee… Sean Turner
- Re: [81attendees] New Requirement for US Employee… Yoav Nir
- Re: [81attendees] New Requirement for US Employee… Ben Campbell
- Re: [81attendees] New Requirement for US Employee… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [81attendees] New Requirement for US Employee… Joe Abley
- Re: [81attendees] New Requirement for US Employee… Randy Bush
- Re: [81attendees] New Requirement for US Employee… Narelle
- Re: [81attendees] New Requirement for US Employee… Fred Baker
- Re: [81attendees] New Requirement for US Employee… Ole Jacobsen