IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [81attendees] Flying via the US

Narelle <narellec@gmail.com> Tue, 12 July 2011 02:49 UTC

Return-Path: <narellec@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 898A59E8007 for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 19:49:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jyGYawPV-KBF for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 19:49:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4E799E8004 for <81attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 19:49:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by fxe4 with SMTP id 4so5696913fxe.27 for <81attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 19:49:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Hb4mZZ8D0Nwj67stxK51PvXM/rGTEVwH4UQBynqliOI=; b=AxCbIE7F9OwmN06aTCy65QTpOETcY6LCKEOpxIPT45TgCUhbznra04UGRuaw0bq0/X ijiLea6JcRO0eq3J0nZxTTTDs7er3pqKER78DfnvkqyU1mCb3FvkLqUwhxFKdClYrEKO Kvt9zVm1EbkoXZNR1R2rXUqbD4qtR+rprT/8A=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.27.71 with SMTP id h7mr8602597fac.142.1310438985979; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 19:49:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.223.83.141 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 19:49:45 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <7C4DFCE962635144B8FAE8CA11D0BF1E058939282A@MX14A.corp.emc.com>
References: <CAProHAQ3UTtQPsG+1cN_z4DheU-LddKLORa+pKRdi4=B3HB+Nw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1107060943210.53401@joyce.lan> <CAHBDyN7WgsQtKD4hcHCfTUiLkc5y1ituzu6SSxw+mpqFg0VeZg@mail.gmail.com> <7C4DFCE962635144B8FAE8CA11D0BF1E058939282A@MX14A.corp.emc.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 12:49:45 +1000
Message-ID: <CACRMD1Hina6NYw+4nJ7aW9=54hyXq9b-89O2TfOo8qqYfE0oTg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Narelle <narellec@gmail.com>
To: 81attendees@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [81attendees] Flying via the US
X-BeenThere: 81attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 81 Attendee List <81attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/81attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:81attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 02:49:47 -0000

This thread has me *very* nervous.

Does anyone know where the Qantas flights land in Dallas (Fort Worth)
compared with where the Air Canada flights take off?

As an Au citizen (though with a thing in my passport that says 'VISA')
I am really worried the gap between flights isn't long enough... and
the dinky maps are not informative enough.


On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 2:58 AM,  <david.black@emc.com> wrote:
> There’s an important warning related to Mary’s message – most flights
> between the US and Canada arrive and depart US airports as if they were
> domestic flights to/from US cities (e.g., in Boston, most flights to/from
> Canada do not use the International Terminal [E]).



-- 


Narelle
narellec@gmail.com

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email