IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [81attendees] sucky Delta hotel network

Roland Bless <roland.bless@kit.edu> Wed, 27 July 2011 14:57 UTC

Return-Path: <roland.bless@kit.edu>
X-Original-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D16D85E8016 for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 07:57:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.94
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.94 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.309, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nJJmNd-02PvU for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 07:57:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from iramx2.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de (iramx2.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de [141.3.10.81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D3365E8023 for <81attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 07:57:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from irams1.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de ([141.3.10.5]) by iramx2.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de with esmtps port 25 id 1Qm5YC-0006km-9R for <81attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 16:57:37 +0200
Received: from i72vorta.tm.uni-karlsruhe.de ([141.3.71.26] helo=vorta.tm.kit.edu) by irams1.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de with esmtp port 25 for <81attendees@ietf.org> id 1Qm5YC-0004l3-5k; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 16:57:32 +0200
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vorta.tm.kit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DB71A805F7 for <81attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 16:57:31 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4E30275A.8070705@kit.edu>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 16:57:30 +0200
From: Roland Bless <roland.bless@kit.edu>
Organization: Institute of Telematics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Thunderbird/1.5 Mnenhy/0.7.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: 81attendees@ietf.org
References: <4E2CC532.3090209@sunet.se> <4E2CCE72.3010500@sunet.se> <4E2E2236.2060808@sunet.se> <87EC2139-C7C2-4113-97E2-9EB9DA2406EA@juniper.net> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1107262259400.80739@joyce.lan> <89602A94-989B-4013-9947-0733AFDD60EA@network-heretics.com> <5104FDC225AB4EAFB44F3EBB5B1ED25F@china.huawei.com> <CACrD=+9zp5-471K78g2A1yp-Hb3S4Pq67SkAUWmAm2whqNdJeA@mail.gmail.com> <9C81D273-BB00-4AFE-8F62-92B94014927C@townsley.net> <44A4D0F6-4775-4C8B-848F-F65271F0C043@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|00dd9a1d56236d3fc19ed27627eee401n6QFGR03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|44A4D0F6-4775-4C8B-848F-F65271F0C043@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <EMEW3|00dd9a1d56236d3fc19ed27627eee401n6QFGR03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|44A4D0F6-4775-4C8B-848F-F65271F0C043@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ATIS-AV: ClamAV (irams1.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de)
X-ATIS-AV: ClamAV (iramx2.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de)
X-ATIS-AV: Kaspersky (iramx2.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de)
X-ATIS-Timestamp: iramx2.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de 1311778657.392102000
Subject: Re: [81attendees] sucky Delta hotel network
X-BeenThere: 81attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 81 Attendee List <81attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/81attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:81attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 14:57:38 -0000

Hi,

On 27.07.2011 16:16, Tim Chown wrote:
> On 27 Jul 2011, at 05:45, Mark Townsley wrote:
>> Same here. Quite bad.
> 
> Interesting, I've not seen any significant issues, compared to
> typical hotel networks.  It certainly seems better first thing in the
> morning, when I guess less people are online.

Same for me. Although the network showed quite some latency, I was able
to call via VoIP (SIP/RTP) in good quality. Maybe it's the physical
connection (cable) that is broken? Do you see L2 errors?

Regards,
 Roland

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email