Re: 50 people vs. newman
"D. J. Bernstein" <djb@koobera.math.uic.edu> Tue, 05 August 1997 21:53 UTC
Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa01830; 5 Aug 97 17:53 EDT
Received: from mail.proper.com (mail.proper.com [206.86.127.224]) by cnri.reston.va.us (8.8.5/8.7.3) with ESMTPid RAA14581; Tue, 5 Aug 1997 17:51:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by mail.proper.com (8.8.5/8.7.3) id OAA12628 for ietf-822-bks; Tue, 5 Aug 1997 14:29:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from koobera.math.uic.edu (qmailr@koobera.math.uic.edu [131.193.178.247]) by mail.proper.com (8.8.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id OAA12620 for <ietf-822@imc.org>; Tue, 5 Aug 1997 14:29:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 29448 invoked by uid 666); 5 Aug 1997 21:33:42 -0000
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 1997 21:33:42 -0000
Message-ID: <19970805213342.29447.qmail@koobera.math.uic.edu>
From: "D. J. Bernstein" <djb@koobera.math.uic.edu>
To: ietf-822@imc.org
Subject: Re: 50 people vs. newman
Sender: owner-ietf-822@imc.org
Precedence: bulk
> Your blantant commercialism pushing your own product qmail is free software. I have no financial interest in it. You may have trouble with this concept, but some people do things for the good of the community, with no prospect of remuneration. > I request that you withdraw your remark and appologize. Are you denying that Newman's system is inferior? For example, do you claim that it handles existing usernames containing "+"? > In you I see little but intrasigence and name calling. Your entire contribution to this discussion has been a series of vague attacks---a transparent attempt to distract attention from the specific objections I have raised to Newman's proposal. ---Dan Set up a new mailing list in a single command. http://pobox.com/~djb/ezmlm.html
- 50 people vs. newman D. J. Bernstein
- Re: 50 people vs. newman Harald.T.Alvestrand
- Re: 50 people vs. newman Valdis.Kletnieks
- Re: 50 people vs. newman Bart Schaefer
- MLM subaddress requirement Chris Newman
- Re: MLM subaddress requirement Valdis.Kletnieks
- Re: MLM subaddress requirement Chris Newman
- Re: 50 people vs. newman D. J. Bernstein
- Re: 50 people vs. newman Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
- Re: MLM subaddress requirement Valdis.Kletnieks
- Re: 50 people vs. newman D. J. Bernstein
- Re: MLM subaddress requirement Donald E. Eastlake 3rd