Re: Restricting the list
"Donald E. Eastlake 3rd" <dee@cybercash.com> Mon, 05 February 1996 21:29 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09004;
5 Feb 96 16:29 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08999;
5 Feb 96 16:29 EST
Received: from list.cren.net by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa14856;
5 Feb 96 16:29 EST
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by list.cren.net
(8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id QAA16654; Mon, 5 Feb 1996 16:29:03 -0500
Received: from callandor.cybercash.com (callandor.cybercash.com
[204.178.186.70]) by list.cren.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id QAA16569;
Mon, 5 Feb 1996 16:27:01 -0500
Received: by callandor.cybercash.com; id QAA00849;
Mon, 5 Feb 1996 16:31:25 -0500
Received: from cybercash.com(204.254.34.52) by callandor.cybercash.com via
smap (g3.0.3) id xma000847; Mon, 5 Feb 96 16:31:06 -0500
Received: by cybercash.com.cybercash.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
id AA27886; Mon, 5 Feb 96 16:23:17 EST
Message-Id: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960205162026.27490B-100000@cybercash.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 1996 16:23:16 -0500 (EST)
X-Orig-Sender: owner-ietf-smtp@list.cren.net
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: "Donald E. Eastlake 3rd" <dee@cybercash.com>
To: Jim Conklin <conklin@info.cren.net>
Cc: ietf-smtp@list.cren.net, ietf-822@list.cren.net
Subject: Re: Restricting the list
In-Reply-To: <199602051616.LAA29953@info.cren.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.0(dev) -- ListProcessor by CREN
While their might be some justification in limiting posting to groups whose primary role is actively working on an engineering task, I think these lists are currently more for general discussion. So I don't think posting should be limited to list members. On the other hand, limiting postings to messages to which one could reply is quite reasonable. Although free.org is a real domain, kristina@free.org is a nonexistent user (at least that's true now). But I don't think there is any standard software for checking this condition. Donald On Mon, 5 Feb 1996, Jim Conklin wrote: > Date: Mon, 5 Feb 1996 11:21:41 +0100 > From: Jim Conklin <conklin@info.cren.net> > To: ietf-smtp@list.cren.net, ietf-822@list.cren.net > Subject: Restricting the list > > Well, we've been caught! I assume that most of you don't wish ads for > nude models (and whatever may follow) in your ietf list mail, and that > those of you who do can find them elsewhwere. > I'm going to take the immediate steps of removing this list from its > globally published status, which may or may not help. > I'm also considering making restricting posting to the subscribers to the > list, which is more restrictive than the normal situation for ietf lists, > so I'd like to get your reactions to that before I do so. I propose that > such a restriction is not overly troublesome because (1) anyone can still > subscribe if posting is that important) and (2) postings are really > meaningful only from people that are fimiliar to the list. > Finally, I must note that if such postings continue, CREN will probably > have to ask for some other site to host the lists, because of the legal > liabilities involved. > What's your pleasure? > > Jim > > > ===================================================================== Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1 508-287-4877(tel) dee@cybercash.com 318 Acton Street +1 508-371-7148(fax) dee@world.std.com Carlisle, MA 01741 USA +1 703-620-4200(main office, Reston, VA) http://www.cybercash.com http://www.eff.org/blueribbon.html
- Restricting the list Jim Conklin
- Re: Restricting the list Ned Freed
- Re: Restricting the list Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
- Re: Restricting the list Roger Fajman
- Re: Restricting the list John W. Noerenberg
- PS -- Re: Restricting the list Nathaniel Borenstein
- Re: Restricting the list Nathaniel Borenstein
- Re: Restricting the list Ben Nowlin
- Re: PS -- Re: Restricting the list Ned Freed
- Re: Restricting the list Ned Freed
- Re: Restricting the list John W. Noerenberg
- Re: PS -- Re: Restricting the list Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
- Re: Restricting the list keld