Re: objections, again
"D. J. Bernstein" <djb@koobera.math.uic.edu> Mon, 04 August 1997 21:21 UTC
Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa28679; 4 Aug 97 17:21 EDT
Received: from mail.proper.com (mail.proper.com [206.86.127.224]) by cnri.reston.va.us (8.8.5/8.7.3) with ESMTPid RAA11040; Mon, 4 Aug 1997 17:19:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by mail.proper.com (8.8.5/8.7.3) id NAA27739 for ietf-822-bks; Mon, 4 Aug 1997 13:47:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from koobera.math.uic.edu (qmailr@koobera.math.uic.edu [131.193.178.247]) by mail.proper.com (8.8.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id NAA27735 for <ietf-822@imc.org>; Mon, 4 Aug 1997 13:47:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 16079 invoked by uid 666); 4 Aug 1997 20:52:28 -0000
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 1997 20:52:27 -0000
Message-ID: <19970804205227.16078.qmail@koobera.math.uic.edu>
From: "D. J. Bernstein" <djb@koobera.math.uic.edu>
To: ietf-822@imc.org
Subject: Re: objections, again
Sender: owner-ietf-822@imc.org
Precedence: bulk
Finally Chris admits some of his mistakes. Chris, I invite you to write an INFORMATIONAL document explaining how e-mail addresses are controlled in AMS. > If they choose to use this variety of subaddressing, then they'd have to > change those addresses or configure in a special MTA alias. In contrast, qmail _automatically_ handles existing accounts that contain the separator character. Why are you trying to standardize an inferior mechanism? > RFC 2142 clearly requires that it be "widget-request". Correct. Now, with your ``+'' as a separator, the widget account doesn't control this ``widget-request'' address, unless the sysadmin sets up one of your ``special MTA aliases.'' In contrast, with ``-'' as a separator, the widget account automatically controls ``widget-request'', so the user's favorite MLM can use ``widget-request'' without special sysadmin support. Why are you trying to standardize an inferior mechanism? > This is an interesting scenario. Do you deny that an MLM ``upgraded'' to support your requirements will cause this security mechanism to fail? > The address encoding used in SMTP is "a,b+c"@d.e for that address. What are you saying? All MUAs have to use SMTP? I'm talking about local UNIX MUAs that pass addresses to the submission agent on the command line---there are more than thirty programs in this category. If they follow your interface requirements, they produce incorrect results with MMDF and qmail for all quoted addresses. > Linking the proposal to a single product when it is already in multiple > products is deceptive. Not at all. Obviously one vendor can imitate another vendor's features. What's deceptive is your list of supporting products: * CMU (AMS, Cyrus) and Innosoft (PMDF) have paid you. * sendmail's support is pathetic---it doesn't allow user-controlled configuration by default. * Pine's support doesn't exist; it was your unverified speculation. ---Dan Set up a new mailing list in a single command. http://pobox.com/~djb/ezmlm.html
- objections, again D. J. Bernstein
- Re: objections, again Chris Newman
- Re: objections, again D. J. Bernstein
- Re: objections, again Todd Vierling
- Re: objections, again Ned Freed
- Re: objections, again Chris Newman
- Re: objections, again Chris Newman
- Re: objections, again D. J. Bernstein