Re: nonexistent-WG Last Call on MIME documents

hansen@pegasus.att.com Wed, 19 June 1996 20:46 UTC

Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa06709; 19 Jun 96 16:46 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa06704; 19 Jun 96 16:46 EDT
Received: from list.cren.net by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa27392; 19 Jun 96 16:46 EDT
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by list.cren.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id QAA15430; Wed, 19 Jun 1996 16:25:35 -0400
Received: from gw3.att.com (gw4.att.com [204.179.186.34]) by list.cren.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id QAA15387 for <ietf-822@list.cren.net>; Wed, 19 Jun 1996 16:24:44 -0400
Received: from pegasus.UUCP by ig4.att.att.com id AA24952; Wed, 19 Jun 96 16:15:54 EDT
Message-Id: <9606192015.AA24952@ig4.att.att.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 1996 16:07 EDT
X-Orig-Sender: owner-ietf-822@list.cren.net
Precedence: bulk
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: hansen@pegasus.att.com
To: ietf-822@list.cren.net
Subject: Re: nonexistent-WG Last Call on MIME documents
Content-Type: text
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.0 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

< the time has come to move on the next step of the MIME documents.

The only problem I have with the proposed documents is the lack of treatment
of the content-disposition header. Rfc 1806 needs to be moved into the
standards track along with these MIME documents. The features of MIME which
were removed in favor of placing them in the content-disposition header
(e.g., Content-Type: name= -> Content-Disposition: filename=) are needed in
the community, and we need a standards track method of dealing with those
features.

					Tony Hansen
			  hansen@pegasus.att.com, tony@attmail.com
		    http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/Tony_Hansen