please don't feed the Dan

Joe Kelsey <joe@zircon.seattle.wa.us> Fri, 08 August 1997 19:50 UTC

Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa13428; 8 Aug 97 15:50 EDT
Received: from mail.proper.com (mail.proper.com [206.86.127.224]) by cnri.reston.va.us (8.8.5/8.7.3) with ESMTPid PAA22991; Fri, 8 Aug 1997 15:48:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by mail.proper.com (8.8.5/8.7.3) id MAA29061 for ietf-822-bks; Fri, 8 Aug 1997 12:14:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uucp1.nwnexus.com (uucp1.nwnexus.com [206.63.63.110]) by mail.proper.com (8.8.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id MAA29056 for <ietf-822@imc.org>; Fri, 8 Aug 1997 12:14:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from uucp@localhost) by uucp1.nwnexus.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with UUCP id MAA22018 for ietf-822@imc.org; Fri, 8 Aug 1997 12:18:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zircon.seattle.wa.us by jhgrud.mselectron.com with bsmtp (Smail3.1.29.1 #6) id m0wwuUv-0008XMC; Fri, 8 Aug 97 12:14 PDT
Received: by zircon.seattle.wa.us via sendmail with stdio id <m0wwuFl-000GCrC@zircon.seattle.wa.us> for ietf-822@imc.org; Fri, 8 Aug 1997 11:59:13 -0700 (PDT) (Smail-3.2 1996-Jul-4 #7 built 1996-Aug-7)
Message-Id: <m0wwuFl-000GCrC@zircon.seattle.wa.us>
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 1997 11:59:13 -0700
From: Joe Kelsey <joe@zircon.seattle.wa.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: ietf-822@imc.org
Subject: please don't feed the Dan
In-Reply-To: <199708081641.MAA01668@lust.cs.utk.edu>
References: <199708081641.MAA01668@lust.cs.utk.edu>
X-Mailer: VM 6.30 under Emacs 19.34.1
Sender: owner-ietf-822@imc.org
Precedence: bulk

I have to say that I completely disagree with Keith on this issue.

Dan has the most cogent, well-thought out sense of a problem of anyone I
have ever encountered on the net.  He has the ability to see through all
of the vagueness and unclear thinking that most users use when posting
messages and boil things down the the basics very quickly.

In this case he has correctly analyzed the broken proposal of Newman as
being an attempt to make the CMU/Innosoft subaddress scheme a global
requirement simply for the perceived benefit of one administrator who
doesn't want to support what user's really want to do.

I have never seen an issue where I disagreed with Dan.  He does tend to
assume that everyone can use the same completely logical thought
processes to arrive at his conclusions, so sometimes it takes people a
little longer to understand his positions.  Or, sometimes people refuse
to take the time to think an issue through and so they never understand
his conclusions, in which case a flame war erupts.  However, the
original source of the flames is always someone who through prejudice or
inability to use logic cannot understand his original position.

/Joe