Comparison between X.400 and the Internet mail.
Andrew Nganga <andrew-n@dsv.su.se> Mon, 05 February 1996 10:32 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07534;
5 Feb 96 5:32 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07530;
5 Feb 96 5:32 EST
Received: from list.cren.net by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04054; 5 Feb 96 5:32 EST
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by list.cren.net
(8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id EAA29416; Mon, 5 Feb 1996 04:49:29 -0500
Received: from mars.dsv.su.se (andrew-n@mars.dsv.su.se [130.237.158.10]) by
list.cren.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id EAA29379;
Mon, 5 Feb 1996 04:46:25 -0500
Received: (from andrew-n@localhost) by mars.dsv.su.se (8.7.1/8.7.1)
id KAA26927; Mon, 5 Feb 1996 10:46:12 +0100
Message-Id: <Pine.ULT.3.91.960205102623.25881A-100000@mars.dsv.su.se>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 1996 10:46:11 +0100 (MET)
X-Orig-Sender: owner-ietf-822@list.cren.net
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Andrew Nganga <andrew-n@dsv.su.se>
To: mailext@list.cren.net, ietf-822@list.cren.net, HDR-PPL@vm.marist.edu,
mhsnews@uninett.no
Subject: Comparison between X.400 and the Internet mail.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.0(dev) -- ListProcessor by CREN
I am a masters student writing a masters thesis, about the success and failures of the Internet mail and X.400, and will be most grateful if you could spare sometime to answer the following few questions; 1) That are the advantages and disadvantages of the methodology of standard development used by ITU/ISO, and that used by IETF,and how have the two methods contributed to the failure or success of the two E-mail systems? 2)What factors do you think have caused the deviation between the standard specifications and what is in reality implemented in X.400 and the internet mail systems? 3)Apart from the ugliness of the X.400 address structure, which other demerits does it have, does it have any merits? 4)What are the merits and demerits of the Internet mail address structure? 5)What are the advantages and disadvantages of ASN.1 used in X.400 and the text oriented EBNF used in the Internet Mail? 6) what are the advantages and the disadvantages of the routing methods used in the X.400 and the Internet mail?
- Comparison between X.400 and the Internet mail. Andrew Nganga
- Re: Comparison between X.400 and the Internet mai⦠Harald.T.Alvestrand