MIME documents - the decision

Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no Fri, 23 August 1996 14:27 UTC

Received: from ietf.org by ietf.org id aa27951; 23 Aug 96 10:27 EDT
Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa27947; 23 Aug 96 10:27 EDT
Received: from list.cren.net by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07843; 23 Aug 96 10:27 EDT
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by list.cren.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id KAA17981; Fri, 23 Aug 1996 10:12:39 -0400
Received: from domen.uninett.no (domen.uninett.no [129.241.131.10]) by list.cren.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id KAA17960 for <ietf-822@list.cren.net>; Fri, 23 Aug 1996 10:12:15 -0400
Received: from domen.uninett.no by domen.uninett.no with SMTP (PP) id <24302-0@domen.uninett.no>; Fri, 23 Aug 1996 16:12:07 +0200
Message-Id: <24299.840809524@domen.uninett.no>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 1996 16:12:04 +0200
X-Orig-Sender: owner-ietf-822@list.cren.net
Precedence: bulk
Sender: ietf-archive-request@ietf.org
From: Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no
To: ietf-822@list.cren.net
Subject: MIME documents - the decision
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Sender: Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.7 5/3/96
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.0 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

The Apps ADs discussed the matter of implementation, features and
when to approve things in the IESG yesterday.

The conclusions reached were roughly:

- The intent of the standards process is that used features are in the
  standard, and useless features are NOT in it.
  Clearly, this is not a simple decision to make.
- The decision on what features should be in the standard and what not
  is something the working group should come to consensus on, not
  something that the ADs should decide.
- Nevertheless, publication of the current set of MIME documents at
  this time is a Good Thing.

Actions resulting from this:

- The current set of MIME drafts is APPROVED, with no changes.
- Before the next advancement in level (to Full Standard), the working
  group will be reconvened (probably by a formal reactivation) to review
  the documents and decide upon the criteria for features being part of
  the Full Standard MIME documents.

Thus spoke the IESG - hope you all can live with that!

                Harald A

(and now to wait for the RFCs - the average wait through the RFC-editor's
queue is around 2 months now)