Re: Mixing text and graphics with text/enriched and multipart/mixed
Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no Sun, 05 May 1996 15:48 UTC
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13046;
5 May 96 11:48 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13042;
5 May 96 11:48 EDT
Received: from list.cren.net by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08450;
5 May 96 11:48 EDT
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by list.cren.net
(8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id LAA17546; Sun, 5 May 1996 11:40:16 -0400
Received: from dimacs.rutgers.edu (root@dimacs.rutgers.edu [128.6.75.16]) by
list.cren.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA17524 for
<ietf-822@list.cren.net>; Sun, 5 May 1996 11:40:03 -0400
Received: from domen.uninett.no (domen.uninett.no [129.241.131.10]) by
dimacs.rutgers.edu (8.6.12+bestmx+oldruq+newsunq+grosshack/8.6.12) with SMTP
id LAA11841 for <ietf-822@dimacs.rutgers.edu>; Sun, 5 May 1996 11:40:04 -0400
Received: from trhm2.or.uninett.no by domen.uninett.no with SMTP (PP)
id <21354-0@domen.uninett.no>; Sun, 5 May 1996 17:39:58 +0200
Received: from dale.uninett.no (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by dale.uninett.no (8.6.9/8.6.12) with ESMTP id RAA10031;
Sun, 5 May 1996 17:39:03 +0200
Message-Id: <10029.831310743@dale.uninett.no>
Date: Sun, 05 May 1996 17:39:03 +0200
X-Orig-Sender: owner-ietf-822@list.cren.net
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no
To: Martin R Raskovsky <martin@atelier.demon.co.uk>
Cc: ietf-822@dimacs.rutgers.edu
Subject: Re: Mixing text and graphics with text/enriched and multipart/mixed
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 03 May 1996 08:27:21 BST."
<9605030727.AA07285@atelier.demon.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <10027.831310742.1@dale.uninett.no>
X-Sender: hta@dale.uninett.no
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.0(beta) -- ListProcessor by CREN
The question was not whether there is a newline after a bodypart or not,
but whether it is legal to assume that a <center> specification in a
text/enriched document has force outside the boundaries of the
text/enriched body part.
To me, the answer is a clear and resounding NO: The MIME strategy is that
bodyparts are independent, unless some bodyparts are specifically
specified to "control" others, such as in multipart/encrypted or
the suggested multipart/related of the MHTML group.
If we say that some portion of attributes set at an arbitrary position
within a bodypart influences the display of the next body parts in a
sequence, correct presentation of bodyparts becomes arbitrarily hard.
This is simply WRONG, no matter how Nathaniel wants to handle body parts
without a terminating NL.
Harald A
- Re:Mixing text and graphics with text/enriched an… Martin R Raskovsky
- Re:Mixing text and graphics with text/enriched an… Martin R Raskovsky
- Re:Mixing text and graphics with text/enriched an… Pete Resnick
- Re: Mixing text and graphics with text/enriched a… Harald.T.Alvestrand