Re: please don't feed the Dan
Chris Newman <Chris.Newman@innosoft.com> Sat, 09 August 1997 00:35 UTC
Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa17356; 8 Aug 97 20:35 EDT
Received: from mail.proper.com (mail.proper.com [206.86.127.224]) by cnri.reston.va.us (8.8.5/8.7.3) with ESMTPid UAA23625; Fri, 8 Aug 1997 20:34:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by mail.proper.com (8.8.5/8.7.3) id RAA01335 for ietf-822-bks; Fri, 8 Aug 1997 17:03:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from THOR.INNOSOFT.COM (SYSTEM@THOR.INNOSOFT.COM [192.160.253.66]) by mail.proper.com (8.8.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAA01331 for <ietf-822@imc.org>; Fri, 8 Aug 1997 17:03:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eleanor.innosoft.com ("port 56692"@ELEANOR.INNOSOFT.COM) by INNOSOFT.COM (PMDF V5.1-9 #8694) with SMTP id <01IM7DGDXQNO94DX8P@INNOSOFT.COM> for ietf-822@imc.org; Fri, 8 Aug 1997 17:06:39 PDT
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 1997 17:08:30 -0700
From: Chris Newman <Chris.Newman@innosoft.com>
Subject: Re: please don't feed the Dan
In-reply-to: <m0wwuFl-000GCrC@zircon.seattle.wa.us>
To: Joe Kelsey <joe@zircon.seattle.wa.us>
Cc: ietf-822@imc.org
Message-id: <Pine.SOL.3.95.970808162853.27896H-100000@eleanor.innosoft.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Originator-Info: login-id=chris; server=thor.innosoft.com
Sender: owner-ietf-822@imc.org
Precedence: bulk
On Fri, 8 Aug 1997, Joe Kelsey wrote: > In this case he has correctly analyzed the broken proposal of Newman as > being an attempt to make the CMU/Innosoft subaddress scheme a global > requirement simply for the perceived benefit of one administrator who > doesn't want to support what user's really want to do. Guessing other people's motives is always a dubious venture, and both Dan and you have guessed incorrectly. My motives are as follows: (1) I like subaddressing and think others would like it as well. (2) Quality MUA interfaces for subaddressing can't be built without a standard since it requires cooperation between MUA and the final delivery agent (which usually are on different hosts). (3) Certain spam-limitation efforts on MLMs make the use of subaddresses for subscriptions a real pain. (4) I like to write standards for the benefit of the community. I also noted that this would benefit my employeer, but that has more impact on my personal vs. work time allocation then anything else. This is a personal proposal -- not an Innosoft or CMU proposal. So I wrote a _first rough draft_ of a standard based on personal experience with the intent to address (1)-(3). I brought the rough draft forward for public comment so it can be refined to a level suitable for standardization, if possible. The result is that I've learned a lot more about how people use subaddresses and will make substantial revisions in the next draft. Now can we please end the confrontational garbage and stick with technical issues? - Chris
- please don't feed the Dan Keith Moore
- please don't feed the Dan Joe Kelsey
- Re: please don't feed the Dan Allen Gwinn
- Re: please don't feed the Dan Chris Newman
- please don't feed the Keith Masataka Ohta