Re: comment for draft-moore-mime-cdisp-00

Mark Crispin <MRC@cac.washington.edu> Wed, 06 August 1997 17:48 UTC

Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa16310; 6 Aug 97 13:48 EDT
Received: from mail.proper.com (mail.proper.com [206.86.127.224]) by cnri.reston.va.us (8.8.5/8.7.3) with ESMTPid NAA16637; Wed, 6 Aug 1997 13:46:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by mail.proper.com (8.8.5/8.7.3) id KAA24779 for ietf-822-bks; Wed, 6 Aug 1997 10:21:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washington.EDU (imp@tomobiki-cho.cac.washington.edu [128.95.135.58]) by mail.proper.com (8.8.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA24767 for <ietf-822@imc.org>; Wed, 6 Aug 1997 10:21:36 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 1997 10:14:47 -0700
From: Mark Crispin <MRC@cac.washington.edu>
Subject: Re: comment for draft-moore-mime-cdisp-00
To: Ned Freed <Ned.Freed@innosoft.com>
cc: "Kenzaburou Tamaru (Exchange)" <kenzat@exchange.microsoft.com>, ietf-822@imc.org
In-Reply-To: <01IM431TIFBU94DNXY@INNOSOFT.COM>
Message-ID: <MailManager.870887687.16996.mrc@Ikkoku-Kan.Panda.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET="US-ASCII"
Sender: owner-ietf-822@imc.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 06 Aug 1997 08:30:05 -0700 (PDT), Ned Freed wrote:
> I-D draft-freed-pvcsc-03.txt, which was recently approved as a proposed
> standard.

I just read it.

The problem is that it uses character sets other than ASCII and Unicode.  This
is a serious burden, since it essentially requires that every application in
the world maintain character set conversion tables.  Actually, it's worse than
that; it uses charsets which are even more disgusting than character sets.

It is alright to encode 8 in 7.  I have no problem with that part of it.  The
problem is the idea of expanding the broken idea of charsets to yet another
place where it doesn't belong.

Language is also good.

The problem is only in the contination of charsets, which is against the
recommendation in the first paragraph of section 8.2 of RFC 2130.