Re: MIME implementation documentation

Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com> Fri, 16 August 1996 14:56 UTC

Received: from ietf.org by ietf.org id aa17123; 16 Aug 96 10:56 EDT
Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa17119; 16 Aug 96 10:56 EDT
Received: from list.cren.net by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08211; 16 Aug 96 10:56 EDT
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by list.cren.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id KAA04361; Fri, 16 Aug 1996 10:46:23 -0400
Received: from glaucus.cso.uiuc.edu (glaucus.cso.uiuc.edu [128.174.81.2]) by list.cren.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id KAA04075 for <ietf-822@list.cren.net>; Fri, 16 Aug 1996 10:45:07 -0400
Received: from resnick1.isdn.uiuc.edu by glaucus.cso.uiuc.edu (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03) id AA10211; Fri, 16 Aug 1996 09:40:39 -0500
Message-Id: <v03007802ae3a38f3d204@resnick1.isdn.uiuc.edu>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 1996 09:43:55 -0500
X-Orig-Sender: owner-ietf-822@list.cren.net
Precedence: bulk
Sender: ietf-archive-request@ietf.org
From: Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com>
To: John C Klensin <klensin@mail1.reston.mci.net>
Cc: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>, Ned Freed <Ned.Freed@innosoft.com>, ietf-822@list.cren.net, Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no
Subject: Re: MIME implementation documentation
In-Reply-To: <SIMEON.9608160551.A@muahost.mail1.reston.mci.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Sender: resnick@glaucus.cso.uiuc.edu
X-Mailer: Eudora [Macintosh version 3.0]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.0 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

On 8/16/96 at 4:47 AM -0500, John C Klensin wrote:

>On Thu, 15 Aug 1996 23:01:25 -0700  Dave Crocker
><dcrocker@brandenburg.com> wrote:
>> 	Yes, we need to audit functions not implemented and remove them
>> from the spec.  do you have any candidates for removal?
>
>Just a hunch, based on MUAs I've looked at recently, but
>   multipart/alternative
>and
>   multipart/parallel
>are good starters.  The only creation-implementations I know of
>either require either hand-fussing (e.g., editing
>proto-outgoing-messages from /mixed) or specialized assembly
>macros that are not what we normally consider MUAs (e.g., the
>process used to prepare the I-D announcements).

Just to name names: I know that Cyberdog on the Macintosh and Microsoft's
new mail and news offering (the latter for which I don't know the release
status) both produce multipart/alternative by default (without "by-hand"
user manipulation) for certain types of messages.

I have, to date, never seen a multipart/parallel message.

pr

--
Pete Resnick <mailto:presnick@qualcomm.com>
QUALCOMM Incorporated
Work: (217)337-6377 / Fax: (217)337-1980