IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [85attendees] Tsa pre line

"John R Levine" <ietf@johnlevine.com> Fri, 09 November 2012 22:59 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@johnlevine.com>
X-Original-To: 85attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 85attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C95021F8680 for <85attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Nov 2012 14:59:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v7EV60ISCPcg for <85attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Nov 2012 14:59:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from leila.iecc.com (leila6.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:4c:6569:6c61]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 370A521F867E for <85attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Nov 2012 14:59:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 11078 invoked from network); 9 Nov 2012 22:59:39 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:vbr-info:user-agent:cleverness; s=2b45.509d8adb.k1211; bh=+/NUKqutpeFHFMOY9TqRgkQ8c6qjbczEM5Imzeirz7k=; b=FfXXtPqi4F5WRuDIpV2jEHbjPUJcKeCstlQBQystkk/6bEm7LtpIm1SyjIdInsj4FSLid3eAwvjae4tbs4S/EjHio37bAOCcDaewX4fCZpLfkx0zPRYXlnUuicYwPfJ3UOLH5BwLhzXD9vQD9oK9agadiCCQ/sP6blqC35BYdek=
VBR-Info: md=iecc.com; mc=all; mv=dwl.spamhaus.org
Received: (ofmipd 127.0.0.1); 9 Nov 2012 22:59:17 -0000
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 17:59:38 -0500
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1211091754030.2608@joyce.lan>
From: John R Levine <ietf@johnlevine.com>
To: "85attendees@ietf.org" <85attendees@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <3D9987AD-B02F-492D-B318-AD9B2CF00FF8@nostrum.com>
References: <CANeU+ZDDxns8jgi9V0pt4=5YBwrAKhJshuGAaWs88yXJFTAMgw@mail.gmail.com> <50DADDE6B33B1B47904E685AAFDC18244656590A4E@yugi.mocana.local> <FA5742FC-6536-434D-B0CE-884E4E8BFA0F@gmail.com> <50DADDE6B33B1B47904E685AAFDC18244656590A50@yugi.mocana.local> <BBB10239-3925-47BF-B5A7-777A271D12A1@tekelec.com> <3D9987AD-B02F-492D-B318-AD9B2CF00FF8@nostrum.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
Cleverness: None detected
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Subject: Re: [85attendees] Tsa pre line
X-BeenThere: 85attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 85 attendees mailing list <85attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/85attendees>, <mailto:85attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/85attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:85attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:85attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/85attendees>, <mailto:85attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 22:59:42 -0000

> I can confirm that precheck worked at the south checkpoint using an 
> American Airlines electronic pass on my iPhone.

Worked for me using a US Airways paper pass, having entered my Nexus 
number into the redress number field as I checked in, since there wasn't a 
field for the known traveller number.

"Worked" in this case means that the walk-through gate beeped when I went 
through, then they swabbed my hands and the machine said I had something 
suspicious on them, then they took me and my baggage into a little room on 
the side which did not please me, then they gave me what was supposed to 
be the super thorough pat down although it was in fact lamer than the one 
you get when you opt out of the xray scanner, then they swabbed the guy's 
gloves, whaddaya know, this machine decided I wasn't explosive after all.

But the whole fiasco took under ten minutes, all with my shoes on.  Gotta 
love that TSA, always new and exciting acts in the security theatre.

R's,
John

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status