Re: [85attendees] Network geography confusion

Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com> Fri, 09 November 2012 03:28 UTC

Return-Path: <pusateri@bangj.com>
X-Original-To: 85attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 85attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E1F521E8040 for <85attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 19:28:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.735
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.735 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oaDO9R4iE9pv for <85attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 19:28:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from oj.bangj.com (amt0.gin.ntt.net [129.250.11.170]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A98E21E803A for <85attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 19:28:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.16.21.105] (unknown [174.107.210.150]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by oj.bangj.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B374311D22; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 22:25:52 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\))
From: Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com>
In-Reply-To: <AC289032-7819-4368-84F2-FFF270C8D751@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 22:28:08 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <0AB2CE4A-457A-4D08-A55A-1884288D7C4E@bangj.com>
References: <E6A16181E5FD2F46B962315BB05962D00D999F56@p2pxmb13.fccnet.win.fcc.gov> <AC289032-7819-4368-84F2-FFF270C8D751@gmail.com>
To: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499)
Cc: "85attendees@ietf.org" <85attendees@ietf.org>, Henning Schulzrinne <Henning.Schulzrinne@fcc.gov>
Subject: Re: [85attendees] Network geography confusion
X-BeenThere: 85attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 85 attendees mailing list <85attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/85attendees>, <mailto:85attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/85attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:85attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:85attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/85attendees>, <mailto:85attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 03:28:15 -0000

On Nov 8, 2012, at 7:41 PM, Joel Jaeggli <joelja@gmail.com> wrote:

> Prefix mobility is poorly coupled the goals of geoip providers. Apple uses bssids which has its own limitations given that APs move...
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On Nov 8, 2012, at 18:34, Henning Schulzrinne <Henning.Schulzrinne@fcc.gov> wrote:
> 
>> Apple seems to believe that our current ietf-a IPv6 network is located in Vancouver, helpfully setting the clock to PST.
>> 
>> Henning

Anyone know the status of this draft? Has it been implemented? Or rejected?

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-manderson-sidr-geo-01

Tom