Re: [86attendees] May Contain Nuts

Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> Fri, 15 March 2013 15:58 UTC

Return-Path: <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: 86attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 86attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9FAC21F85CC for <86attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 08:58:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.888
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.888 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.711, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CWDvxliDO5oS for <86attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 08:58:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk [IPv6:2001:630:d0:f102::25e]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E399321F85BD for <86attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 08:58:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r2FFwI2R024703; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 15:58:18 GMT
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.2 falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk r2FFwI2R024703
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=ecs.soton.ac.uk; s=200903; t=1363363098; bh=zrvmoFHA2VQ0V3h3Bo+kSikP6gI=; h=Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=PimDtGimJ9vYVybniWYt0dOkhx7Ga0EGpLnmWjWphbqT55LkhpesaTQw5zIs4QBpt 5C2aKPBLEEtA+Y2Un+t9rvhPrInjD3uJhND1iTtTpqvm9mkF4lCMoFBSPNbC7n6WmE QgFwPNB36jKPSITqsg/SQ2xmRGQT8c7g9I7YGjMo=
Received: from gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk (gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk [2001:630:d0:f102::25d]) by falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk [2001:630:d0:f102::25e]) envelope-from <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> with ESMTP (valid=N/A) id p2EFwH0430641439oY ret-id none; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 15:58:18 +0000
Received: from [IPv6:2001:df8::16:31da:63e7:58e8:d557] ([IPv6:2001:df8:0:16:31da:63e7:58e8:d557]) (authenticated bits=0) by gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r2FFvtkW017650 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 15 Mar 2013 15:57:57 GMT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\))
From: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <CAMvf=7aDEntQM0_k_x4ewYuvmbi9xXmAnX_gWZu4MDU5EJk8vA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 15:57:55 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <EMEW3|7be4d395c3a23411862046f3252fd3cdp2EFwH03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|FDE31728-0270-41DA-BEBD-CCAABBB1256B@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
References: <3ebeebf9-29cf-4319-bc11-364eeb609df6@blur> <51433F89.4080006@dcrocker.net> <CAMvf=7aDEntQM0_k_x4ewYuvmbi9xXmAnX_gWZu4MDU5EJk8vA@mail.gmail.com> <FDE31728-0270-41DA-BEBD-CCAABBB1256B@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: CJ Aronson <cja@daydream.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499)
X-ECS-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean
X-smtpf-Report: sid=p2EFwH043064143900; tid=p2EFwH0430641439oY; client=relay,ipv6; mail=; rcpt=; nrcpt=4:0; fails=0
X-ECS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-ECS-MailScanner-ID: r2FFwI2R024703
X-ECS-MailScanner-From: tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Cc: "86attendees@ietf.org" <86attendees@ietf.org>, dcrocker@bbiw.net, Eric Burger <eburger@standardstrack.com>
Subject: Re: [86attendees] May Contain Nuts
X-BeenThere: 86attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <86attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/86attendees>, <mailto:86attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/86attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:86attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:86attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/86attendees>, <mailto:86attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 15:58:30 -0000

On 15 Mar 2013, at 15:37, CJ Aronson <cja@daydream.com> wrote:

> This seems like a more appropriate warning  :-)

'Like' 

> 
> ----CJ
> 
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> wrote:
>> Are you proposing that this warning be added to the IETF Note Well?
>> 
>> If you aren't, I am.
>> 
>> d/
>> 
>> --
>> Dave Crocker
>> Brandenburg InternetWorking
>> bbiw.net
>> _______________________________________________
>> 86attendees mailing list
>> 86attendees@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/86attendees
> <IMG_2856.jpeg>_______________________________________________
> 86attendees mailing list
> 86attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/86attendees