IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [87attendees] [87all] IETF 87 Berlin Meeting Review

"Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com> Wed, 21 August 2013 15:18 UTC

Return-Path: <agmalis@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 87attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 87attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F98D21F9BF2 for <87attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 08:18:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pWqdE64XLDE0 for <87attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 08:18:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-we0-x232.google.com (mail-we0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::232]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BF6421F9C00 for <87attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 08:18:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-we0-f178.google.com with SMTP id u54so524175wes.23 for <87attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 08:18:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=sm868gOmLRCzmiYWymMTprc3N1YBSRBxT+HnfIRc1mM=; b=P3vOpa9EjZewM7t4sCxyW6EG9Ha5d/GAqdfgwLRZy+o4ZWtHYq/FpZLTqrB/iBjKEw FMnCN6maZiLbOMxQNZul4DEhlptdfAQOiWLFK6mUHljA3I8heJmuA+mjpaGpSNjWzMPV VKXOKK/ooxTGll6ppP+RMuBE5ykZPYIYKH/6zHqe6CUMQpDRrpSkdKpdeGvP1nIQNrvk W4WBc1J2CVzfcOA3t0uq/sZ35GoqGI3FXuO0g+5tXhPlB7ReoQqqA2OMg6voYPLX24uf rrInln68PdUUg4Ja7eg3B6cVaHDDxvecALiENW/qHSDYzwhFHHQDvA9/1E+QNV4zu7H4 RrkA==
X-Received: by 10.180.183.51 with SMTP id ej19mr5860183wic.60.1377098310497; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 08:18:30 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.255.20 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 08:18:09 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <A08995CD-EE8B-4166-8E92-B206409BD837@oracle.com>
References: <CAJgsEzVK1E-RYDo4kGnxeueOqyDOyXz7AeMAXysBTnko_pu4ug@mail.gmail.com> <CABmDk8mE11Qbz3mLq1Ef_itukTzCCDBtkNZJ0XCz6HVyB2AZaw@mail.gmail.com> <520FB278.9050609@dcrocker.net> <520FBCDC.6080808@nomountain.net> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B630775259D6B@mbx-01.win.nominum.com> <CABmDk8=+Nke05KED3Lrp2wzyQ2yy1BgYbgfPkRkeDwQ6s-zWFA@mail.gmail.com> <AED5379E-122B-4CFA-B197-BC585941E44A@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|bab3032ef478727a6ccd2570b8a5f3d8p7HDDJ03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|AED5379E-122B-4CFA-B197-BC585941E44A@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <A08995CD-EE8B-4166-8E92-B206409BD837@oracle.com>
From: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 11:18:09 -0400
Message-ID: <CAA=duU2bfWLGomqgU6_PFP+E501JMa_+d9iJZ4YOqhHBmvMOgg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Hadriel Kaplan <hadriel.kaplan@oracle.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c2409e9e3ca604e476af8d"
Cc: "87attendees@ietf.org attendees" <87attendees@ietf.org>, Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: [87attendees] [87all] IETF 87 Berlin Meeting Review
X-BeenThere: 87attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <87attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/87attendees>, <mailto:87attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/87attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:87attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:87attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/87attendees>, <mailto:87attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 15:18:32 -0000

I agree that the Minneapolis Hilton works well for the IETF, and would like
us to return there.

We will be meeting during off-peak times in Vancouver, London, and
Honolulu, so travel costs should be lower.

Cheers,
Andy


On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Hadriel Kaplan
<hadriel.kaplan@oracle.com>wrote:

>
> On Aug 18, 2013, at 8:13 AM, Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> > Minneapolis was a great venue. Is there a particular reason it's dropped
> off the meeting schedule?
>
> I don't know the official reason, but IIRC the attendance rates for
> Minneapolis were always lower than the meeting before and after.  It's hard
> to argue with actual numbers.  It could be that other factors contributed
> to that, but I doubt it.
>
> -hadriel
>
> _______________________________________________
> 87attendees mailing list
> 87attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/87attendees
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email