Re: [87attendees] SIM purchase at the IETF (was Re: [87all] IETF 87 Berlin Meeting Review)
Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com> Wed, 21 August 2013 19:11 UTC
Return-Path: <ole@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: 87attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 87attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 239F411E8122 for <87attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Wed, 21 Aug 2013 12:11:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2Quja7-Ntjf3 for
<87attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 12:11:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mtv-iport-2.cisco.com (mtv-iport-2.cisco.com [173.36.130.13])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D67D11E8113 for
<87attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 12:11:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com;
l=2249; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1377112284; x=1378321884;
h=date:from:reply-to:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id: references:mime-version;
bh=PjycQDjNxCmXluRLDPE32gBEEPq8a43cDqRtxyp2OVc=;
b=i5HuvaLoxi3tGvptDyjQ1VBcYXvL7cqYrRRZBJgTih9dhOk29JEw4wyU
OwFCjE52pxIed5p8P4QZB3C0uABgfMMrknxw42F0/bWY5TDP6XQ7R+r37
yays+NT5uVIxr2EgBNAO/aTgNgnUXpzsLu3bAgfGIh//XKSYBxZzH33gA 0=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.89,929,1367971200"; d="scan'208";a="89723581"
Received: from mtv-core-4.cisco.com ([171.68.58.9]) by mtv-iport-2.cisco.com
with ESMTP; 21 Aug 2013 19:11:24 +0000
Received: from [10.27.1.132] (sjc-ole-8913.cisco.com [10.27.1.132]) by
mtv-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r7LJBMFC026834
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
Wed, 21 Aug 2013 19:11:23 GMT
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 12:11:22 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com>
To: "Carlos M. Martinez" <carlos@lacnic.net>
In-Reply-To: <52150B55.9050601@lacnic.net>
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.01.1308211156080.19510@173-11-110-132-sfba.hfc.comcastbusiness.net>
References: <6j3itkppvci8vejnmp4rlv2u.1376669623100@email.android.com>
<m2siy9h1iv.wl%randy@psg.com>
<8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B630775258D72@mbx-01.win.nominum.com>
<m28v01gj6z.wl%randy@psg.com> <520F663F.3000505@gmail.com>
<2671C6CDFBB59E47B64C10B3E0BD59230439D43698@PRVPEXVS15.corp.twcable.com>
<5214EB43.2030304@dcrocker.net> <5214F834.2090701@gmail.com>
<0FB5FD13-2E44-46F7-A909-EC383B51AAD7@gmail.com>
<5215043B.2060509@lacnic.net>
<3512BB31280C39448A9880F61DD54CEB0A75E74A@xmb-aln-x09.cisco.com>
<52150B55.9050601@lacnic.net>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.01 (OSX 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: 87 Attendees <87attendees@ietf.org>, joel jaeggli <joelja@gmail.com>,
Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com>,
"David Lake \(dlake\)" <dlake@cisco.com>,
"dcrocker@bbiw.net" <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
Subject: Re: [87attendees] SIM purchase at the IETF (was Re: [87all] IETF 87
Berlin Meeting Review)
X-BeenThere: 87attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com>
List-Id: <87attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/87attendees>,
<mailto:87attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/87attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:87attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:87attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/87attendees>,
<mailto:87attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 19:11:30 -0000
On Wed, 21 Aug 2013, Carlos M. Martinez wrote: > Hello, > > the problem with the all the 'but' cases is that they sometimes cannot > all be addressed. However, this is not a valid reason to not address the > problem/request at all. > > "Since we cannot accomodate every_single_particular_possible_request, we > decided to do nothing" just doesn't cut it. On the other hand, > accomodating 80% percents of the perceived needs does cut it. > > cheers > > ~CArlos > Carlos, Nobody is suggesting that "we decided to do nothing." What has been suggested is that SIM information is better provided by someone "local" be that the host, sponsor or simply someone who lives in the locale in question. Putting on an IETF meeting is a huge undertaking and it literally takes WEEKS of work from a team of dedicated volunteers and contractors who worry about everything from local electrical power conditions to ensuring that the IETF meeting network routing prefixes are properly propagated, and much more. Adding the SIM info to the list of "nice things to have" would certainly be fine, expecting that this become a mandatory requirement for hosts or even something the secretariat has on their task list seems a little too much to ask in my opinion. The Wiki model has worked, volunteer efforts such as http://hiroshima-info.info are also helpful (I have been told), but please remember that it is/was a volunteer effort, not a contracted piece of work. I think SIM info is certainly something that a number of people are interested in and Randy has already collected some information in the make-shift wiki. I am sure there will be much more to come. By the way, if you are reading this and happen to actually LIVE in Vancouver, please get in touch. There are many tasks on our to-do list for that meeting where local assistance would be greatly appreciated and actually reduce the cost of running the meeting. Your tax^H^H^ meeting dollars at work. Cheers, Ole Ole J. Jacobsen Editor and Publisher, The Internet Protocol Journal Cisco Systems Tel: +1 408-527-8972 Mobile: +1 415-370-4628 E-mail: ole@cisco.com URL: http://www.cisco.com/ipj Skype: organdemo
- Re: [87attendees] SIM purchase at the IETF (was R… Toerless Eckert (eckert)
- Re: [87attendees] SIM purchase at the IETF (was R… John R Levine
- Re: [87attendees] SIM purchase at the IETF (was R… Randy Bush
- Re: [87attendees] SIM purchase at the IETF (was R… joel jaeggli
- Re: [87attendees] SIM purchase at the IETF (was R… Ted Lemon
- Re: [87attendees] SIM purchase at the IETF (was R… Randy Bush
- Re: [87attendees] SIM purchase at the IETF (was R… Spencer Dawkins
- Re: [87attendees] SIM purchase at the IETF (was R… Keith Moore
- Re: [87attendees] SIM purchase at the IETF (was R… Randy Bush
- Re: [87attendees] SIM purchase at the IETF (was R… George, Wes
- Re: [87attendees] SIM purchase at the IETF (was R… Dave Crocker
- Re: [87attendees] SIM purchase at the IETF Keith Mitchell
- Re: [87attendees] SIM purchase at the IETF (was R… joel jaeggli
- Re: [87attendees] SIM purchase at the IETF (was R… Brian Dickson
- Re: [87attendees] SIM purchase at the IETF (was R… Carlos M. Martinez
- Re: [87attendees] SIM purchase at the IETF (was R… David Lake (dlake)
- Re: [87attendees] SIM purchase at the IETF (was R… Carlos M. Martinez
- Re: [87attendees] SIM purchase at the IETF (was R… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [87attendees] SIM purchase at the IETF (was R… John R Levine
- Re: [87attendees] SIM purchase at the IETF (was R… Carlos M. Martinez
- Re: [87attendees] SIM purchase at the IETF (was R… David Lake (dlake)
- Re: [87attendees] SIM purchase at the IETF (was R… David Lake (dlake)
- Re: [87attendees] SIM purchase at the IETF (was R… Dave Crocker
- Re: [87attendees] SIM purchase at the IETF (was R… John R Levine
- Re: [87attendees] SIM purchase at the IETF (was R… Randy Bush